Several lawmakers say a delegate who sponsored the bill, Scott Cadle (R - Mason, 13), brought in the drinks.
"[Cadle] caught me in the hallway, offered a cup to me, and you want to try to be a gentleman," McGeehan said. "I had a small sip and walked away and tossed the rest of it."
"I highly doubt raw milk had anything to do with it, in my case," McGeehan said.
According to the Kanwaha-Charleston Health Department, raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria and parasites.
But, supporters say, raw milk has a higher nutritional content and is more ethical.
"I don't think it's any riskier than eating raw oysters or anything like that," McGeehan said.
McGeehan believes the milk you drink is a personal choice.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:get your government hands off my milk
HARRY ENTEN 11:00 PM
As we come to a close here, I wanted to put in perspective what a large audience Democrats are getting on Univision. According to a 2013 Pew Research Center report, Univision has more viewers than the Fox network and nearly the same number as ABC. Moreover, Univision tops all of the English-speaking networks in terms of viewers ages 18 to 49.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
My exasperation with Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state is long-standing and unabated. Lucky for her, political idiocy is not criminal.
Ruth Marcus is a columnist for The Post, specializing in American politics and domestic policy.
“There are plenty of unattractive facts but not a lot of clear evidence of criminality, and we tend to forget the distinction,” American University law professor Stephen Vladeck, an expert on prosecutions involving classified information, told me. “This is really just a political firestorm, not a criminal case.”
Could a clever law student fit the fact pattern into a criminal violation? Sure. Would a responsible federal prosecutor pursue it? Hardly — absent new evidence, based on my conversations with experts in such prosecutions.
There are two main statutory hooks. Title 18, Section 1924, a misdemeanor, makes it a crime for a government employee to “knowingly remove” classified information “without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location.”
Petraeus clearly knew the material he provided to Paula Broadwell was classified and that she was not authorized to view it. “Highly classified . . . code word stuff in there,” he told her. He lied to FBI agents, the kind of behavior that tends to inflame prosecutors.
In Clinton’s case, by contrast, there is no clear evidence that Clinton knew (or even should have known) that the material in her emails was classified. Second, it is debatable whether her use of the private server constituted removal or retention of material. Finally, the aggravating circumstance of false statements to federal agents is, as far as we know, absent.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
JFLNYC wrote:pacino wrote:TARP was necessary. It should've had more requirements attached to it but TARP was needed legislation, unfortunately.
Exactly. First of all when your company is about to fail, anyone who provides the necessary financing to keep you going (in this case the government) should get a significant equity position with the existing shareholders taking a serious haircut. That's the way it works in the real market. When the banks are the ones providing the financing for shaky businesses that's exactly what they insist upon. Just as in the auto bailout that's what should have happened here. And the other leg of the three-legged stool should have been meaningful relief for mortgage holders specified at the time of the deal.
pacino wrote:Lawmakers in West Virginia Celebrate Legalization of Raw Milk By Drinking It and Getting SickSeveral lawmakers say a delegate who sponsored the bill, Scott Cadle (R - Mason, 13), brought in the drinks.
"[Cadle] caught me in the hallway, offered a cup to me, and you want to try to be a gentleman," McGeehan said. "I had a small sip and walked away and tossed the rest of it."
"I highly doubt raw milk had anything to do with it, in my case," McGeehan said.
According to the Kanwaha-Charleston Health Department, raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria and parasites.
But, supporters say, raw milk has a higher nutritional content and is more ethical.
"I don't think it's any riskier than eating raw oysters or anything like that," McGeehan said.
McGeehan believes the milk you drink is a personal choice.
get your government hands off my milk
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
traderdave wrote:Didn't watch much of the debate last night but I did catch this bit:
And I find it interesting that when Secretary Clinton, who was the former senator of New York, of course, when she defended her vote, she said, well, it's going to help the big banks in New York. Those are my constituents. And then you go to Detroit and suddenly this legislation helps the automobile workers. There was an article just yesterday...
SALINAS: Your time is up, Senator.
SANDERS: ... where people like Senator Bayh and Ron Wyden, Byron Dorgan...
SALINAS: Senator -- your time is up, Senator.
SANDERS: ...former senators said, no, this wasn't the automobile bailout. It was the bailout of Wall Street.
RAMOS: Thank you.
SALINAS: We have to move on. Senator, the time is up. We have to move on.
Unfortunately, when the time comes, I will be a good little soldier and fall in line behind Clinton - but I won't like it.
TenuredVulture wrote:Didn't TARP end up making money for the government anyway?
Doll Is Mine wrote:traderdave wrote:Didn't watch much of the debate last night but I did catch this bit:
And I find it interesting that when Secretary Clinton, who was the former senator of New York, of course, when she defended her vote, she said, well, it's going to help the big banks in New York. Those are my constituents. And then you go to Detroit and suddenly this legislation helps the automobile workers. There was an article just yesterday...
SALINAS: Your time is up, Senator.
SANDERS: ... where people like Senator Bayh and Ron Wyden, Byron Dorgan...
SALINAS: Senator -- your time is up, Senator.
SANDERS: ...former senators said, no, this wasn't the automobile bailout. It was the bailout of Wall Street.
RAMOS: Thank you.
SALINAS: We have to move on. Senator, the time is up. We have to move on.
Unfortunately, when the time comes, I will be a good little soldier and fall in line behind Clinton - but I won't like it.
This happened all night. The moderators let Clinton ramble on yet they always seemed to cut Sanders off after 30 seconds or so. It was very strange.
The FDA's mission is to promote the public health and if raw milk is a threat to it, then it's within their purview to regulate it.The Crimson Cyclone wrote:pacino wrote:Lawmakers in West Virginia Celebrate Legalization of Raw Milk By Drinking It and Getting SickSeveral lawmakers say a delegate who sponsored the bill, Scott Cadle (R - Mason, 13), brought in the drinks.
"[Cadle] caught me in the hallway, offered a cup to me, and you want to try to be a gentleman," McGeehan said. "I had a small sip and walked away and tossed the rest of it."
"I highly doubt raw milk had anything to do with it, in my case," McGeehan said.
According to the Kanwaha-Charleston Health Department, raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria and parasites.
But, supporters say, raw milk has a higher nutritional content and is more ethical.
"I don't think it's any riskier than eating raw oysters or anything like that," McGeehan said.
McGeehan believes the milk you drink is a personal choice.
get your government hands off my milk
to be fair, I don't think the government should have a right to tell you you can't drink what you want
but the dummies should be aware that raw milk drinkers have built up an immunity to most of what makes you sick
personally I would love to have certain raw cheeses available
mozartpc27 wrote:I was just thinking about how sad I was that I missed out on tremetol vomiting.