Bucky wrote:so we're saying projecting success for young players is an inexact science
JFLNYC wrote:I'm sorry if this has come off as bashing Asche. That's not my intention. I like Asche and think he will improve as a hitter, and think he has a role on the team, just not as our regular 3B long-term.a
JFLNYC wrote:I don't know who suggested cutting bait on Asche. I know I didn't.
JFLNYC wrote:If Franco looks ready in ST, I give him the job, even expecting that he'll likely struggle for awhile. At the very least, by all accounts he's better defensively than Asche. If Franco's not ready and someone like Asche has to fill in for a couple of months, so be it. I'm looking to the future and, if I'm the Phillies, the future has Franco at the 3B and does not include Asche at 1B.
I've said before and will say it again: I haven't "given up" on Asche. He has a role, but it's not as a regular 3B or 1B. It's as a supersub.
phorever wrote:JFLNYC wrote:Put simply, to win championships a team needs to be above average.
Asche is a below average hitter, fielder and baserunner.
put simply, i agree with you on the above average strategy, but i believe that a combination of 1b and 3b players that includes asche getting 300+ pa's is reasonably likely (better than 1/3 chance) to produce above average production at both positions, and currently is the phillies best option for getting above average production at those positions over the next three season.
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:phandom by zipcode
pacino wrote:phandom by zipcode
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.