ReadingPhilly wrote:is his salary for this season more than their entire payroll?
Manny's lunch today was more than the Marlins payroll.
I think there payrolls was only like 22 million but I am not sure
ReadingPhilly wrote:is his salary for this season more than their entire payroll?
Philly the Kid wrote:jp_chips wrote:How are we overmatched when we have been battling for 1st place the last three years.If your measuring stick is Bos.,NYY,NYM,LAA or Cubs then your right we are overmatched against their fan base,and their TV contracts.Those teams have more resources than us.Until we get more of a national audience an a TV station that can supply more of an income we will have to stay somewhere around the budget we have now.
So its just money. This ownership group/front-office has been to one WS in 25 years, and 1 playoffs other than that. They have been saddled with some real bad contracts. Made some terrible moves and lacked a long term vision or a track record of success. I don't see it that they took a 75 win team and got it to 86. I see a 95-100 win team that has been stuck at 86-88. That is medicority and it's a lot more than TV contracts. This is 2008 and there are ways to generate revenue and make the team more valuable and more loved. But winning trumps everything.
With some better planning and more realistic look at this roster in the off-season, with a better understanding of what Cholly costs them, they might have a 5-10 game lead rather than hanging on hoping other teams self-destruct worse.
Will Carroll of Baseball Prospectus says the Red Sox, Pirates and Marlins have agreed to a three-team Manny Ramirez deal, pending Ramirez waiving his no-trade clause and league approval.
Carroll, not normally one of our preferred sources, has the Red Sox getting Jason Bay and John Grabow; the Marlins acquiring Ramirez, cash and a prospect from the Red Sox and the Pirates picking up Jeremy Hermida, two prospects from the Marlins and one from Boston.
jp_chips wrote:Philly the Kid wrote:jp_chips wrote:How are we overmatched when we have been battling for 1st place the last three years.If your measuring stick is Bos.,NYY,NYM,LAA or Cubs then your right we are overmatched against their fan base,and their TV contracts.Those teams have more resources than us.Until we get more of a national audience an a TV station that can supply more of an income we will have to stay somewhere around the budget we have now.
So its just money. This ownership group/front-office has been to one WS in 25 years, and 1 playoffs other than that. They have been saddled with some real bad contracts. Made some terrible moves and lacked a long term vision or a track record of success. I don't see it that they took a 75 win team and got it to 86. I see a 95-100 win team that has been stuck at 86-88. That is medicority and it's a lot more than TV contracts. This is 2008 and there are ways to generate revenue and make the team more valuable and more loved. But winning trumps everything.
With some better planning and more realistic look at this roster in the off-season, with a better understanding of what Cholly costs them, they might have a 5-10 game lead rather than hanging on hoping other teams self-destruct worse.
No its not just money,but more money can help fix more mistakes yes?I think the problem is we magnify every move and quote this team makes[edit not problem does make this more worth while].but until you can magnify everyother team in the majors as much as we magnify the phils its hard to say how many other managers make in game mistakes or their mangement throws one of their players under the bus.
since the phillies moved into there new ballpark this teams budget has increased so they are moving in the right direction.
LongDrive wrote:kenrosenthal wrote:jacobs pulled from marlins game according to carroll
The game has been over for 30 minures
LongDrive wrote:kenrosenthal wrote:jacobs pulled from marlins game according to carroll
The game has been over for 30 minures
Trent Steele wrote:i cant read that crap its too jumbled with the format and not enough punctuation and too much stream of what im not sure what the topic is
kenrosenthal wrote:Trent Steele wrote:i cant read that crap its too jumbled with the format and not enough punctuation and too much stream of what im not sure what the topic is
i think the + means positive moves and -means negative. i dont really understand how the moves were determined positive or negative tho
kenrosenthal wrote:Trent Steele wrote:i cant read that crap its too jumbled with the format and not enough punctuation and too much stream of what im not sure what the topic is
i think the + means positive moves and -means negative. i dont really understand how the moves were determined positive or negative tho