td11 wrote:

momadance wrote:Effective 10/29:

USCIS no longer considers children of U.S. government employees and U.S. armed forces members residing outside the United States as “residing in the United States” for purposes of acquiring citizenship under INA 320.3

Per this "new" doctrine, if you are in the military and stationed overseas and have a child, that child no longer has natural born citizenship. The child can be naturalized, but this removes all ability to claim the child is a natural born citizen - thus ineligible to run for president. Seems to me like it is an anti John McCain rule.

Conservatives truly support the troops

thephan wrote:That report that Trump offered pardoned to help fast track his wall has been replied to from the White House. The reply is predictably that he was just kidding. That of course means that the jack ass said it. The jack ass told staff that they should do whatever it takes no matter what it takes no matter the legality to implement his ridiculous vision and that he would pardon them. When he gets caught with his long tie shoved in his pants fly then he comes up with the idea that he was just kidding. What the fuck is he nine years old?

pacino wrote:Gillibrand dropped out

smitty wrote:

momadance wrote:Effective 10/29:

USCIS no longer considers children of U.S. government employees and U.S. armed forces members residing outside the United States as “residing in the United States” for purposes of acquiring citizenship under INA 320.3

Per this "new" doctrine, if you are in the military and stationed overseas and have a child, that child no longer has natural born citizenship. The child can be naturalized, but this removes all ability to claim the child is a natural born citizen - thus ineligible to run for president. Seems to me like it is an anti John McCain rule.

This is a disgrace. Perhaps we can fix it by having draft dodgers lose their citizenship.

Trent Steele wrote:I'm pretty sure that you can't be pardoned preemptively (fairly certain a conviction is required), so that won't protect these idiots when the DOJ files an action in Feb 2021 after fucknuts loses.

JUburton wrote:uncle abramson

Trent Steele wrote:I'm pretty sure that you can't be pardoned preemptively (fairly certain a conviction is required), so that won't protect these idiots when the DOJ files an action in Feb 2021 after #$!&@ loses.

JFLNYC wrote:

Trent Steele wrote:I'm pretty sure that you can't be pardoned preemptively (fairly certain a conviction is required), so that won't protect these idiots when the DOJ files an action in Feb 2021 after fucknuts loses.

Not so. See, e.g., Nixon, Richard M.