drsmooth wrote:You forgot Joe Arpaio (drumpf isn't - leaving him behind, that is)

pacino wrote:"Our country is going to hell." - The Donald, tonight

drsmooth wrote:You forgot Joe Arpaio (drumpf isn't - leaving him behind, that is)

The B1G Piece wrote:

drsmooth wrote:You forgot Joe Arpaio (drumpf isn't - leaving him behind, that is)

hope he leaves him in Mexico, too.

JFLNYC wrote:

Youseff wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:So monetary contributions to a politician can bias the politician in favor of the contributor. Did that author actually get paid to come up with that revelation?

do you agree with the implication that donations to the CF influenced decisions in the State Dept?

I believe that contributions made to the political campaigns and Super PAC's of our members of Congress and to our state attorneys general have resulted in significant preferential policies and decisions for the contributors. I've yet to be made aware of any significant policy or decision by the HRC Department of State which was influenced by contributions to the Clinton Foundation.

jerseyhoya wrote:

Doll Is Mine wrote:Mexicans are not happy about this visit. They're not happy with Pena Nieto.

This feels more and more like a stunt by the Mexican President to regain his popularity by confronting Trump.

This should make Hillary supporters nervous. A fight between a foreign leader and Trump could help both in their respective countries. The Mexican prez could take Trump's position apart piece by piece rationally, but might have more incentive to overdo it for his own gain, but in a way that makes it easy to spin for Trump for an American audience.

Soren wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Doll Is Mine wrote:Mexicans are not happy about this visit. They're not happy with Pena Nieto.

This feels more and more like a stunt by the Mexican President to regain his popularity by confronting Trump.

This should make Hillary supporters nervous. A fight between a foreign leader and Trump could help both in their respective countries. The Mexican prez could take Trump's position apart piece by piece rationally, but might have more incentive to overdo it for his own gain, but in a way that makes it easy to spin for Trump for an American audience.

Yea I mean he got completely dressed down by a rational human being but suddenly I feel like he's much more appealing as a candidate.

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:Republicans don't view Mexicans as human beings

kruker wrote:

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:Republicans don't view Mexicans as human beings

Riiiight.

td11 wrote:@davidminpdx
1. Something is going on in District Attorney elections. Voters are beginning to reject “tough-on-crime,” “law-and-order” candidates.

https://twitter.com/davidminpdx/status/ ... 7156166656

Thought this was a good thread of tweets

Doll Is Mine wrote:

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538
Amused by divide between reporters who assume Mexico visit will be a diplomatic coup for Trump!!! & those who assume it will be a shitshow. I'm #TeamShitshow, because come the fuck on, this is Donald Trump visiting Mexico with Rudy & Sessions on 2 days notice. But, we'll see.

"If we were physiologically — not mentally, emotionally, professionally equal to men. If we were physiologically as strong as men, rape would not exist. You would be able to defend yourself," Conway said.

What makes the clip even stranger is that Conway made the remarks unprompted. The panel was discussing women in the military and how much physical strength female soldiers should have compared to their male counterparts. The point about rape seemingly came out of left field.

pacino wrote:the FBI released that they previously found emails from Clinton discussing it.