Youseff wrote:once this is over I hope there's no more Trump puns or adoptions and re-purposing of his sayings

Youseff wrote:once this is over I hope there's no more Trump puns or adoptions and re-purposing of his sayings

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:This thread title sucks.

Can we get back to the pressing issue... that doc thought this woman looked manly enough to call her a transgender:

The results raise the important possibility that monetary favors bias judgments in domains seemingly unrelated to the favor but nevertheless act in an implicit way through neural networks that underlie normal, ongoing preference judgments.

PhillieMooDo wrote:Whether or not she looks "manly" enough, it's a stupid #$!&@ thing to say.

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

PhillieMooDo wrote:Whether or not she looks "manly" enough, it's a stupid #$!&@ thing to say.

Well, yes. Just trying to give the full picture. Figuratively and literally.

Werthless wrote:Re: Clinton foundation donations. One reason that it's frowned upon is that favors/donations literally affect the brain's perception of the donor. It doesn't have to be conscious corruption at all.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20631188

The results raise the important possibility that monetary favors bias judgments in domains seemingly unrelated to the favor but nevertheless act in an implicit way through neural networks that underlie normal, ongoing preference judgments.

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:This thread title sucks.

Can we get back to the pressing issue... that doc thought this woman looked manly enough to call her a transgender:

DONALD TRUMP’S approach to immigration is a practical-minded strategy that holds the promise of defusing an incendiary debate while recognizing political and labor market realities. Donald Trump’s approach to immigration is a humanitarian and economic disaster that will sunder families, upend communities and subvert American workplaces and businesses.

Take your pick. Mr. Trump certainly has. If it’s Wednesday (or Friday, or Monday), it must be pivot day. Demanding consistency of Mr. Trump is like demanding it of the weather — an exercise in la-la-land high-mindedness best left to the sanctimonious precincts of editorial pages.