
Doll Is Mine wrote:New York attorney general has opened probe into Trump Foundation, according to Politico.

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:CalvinBall wrote:http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html
Newsweek
ended up being much more detailed than I thought it would be, wonder if it'll have any effect?
No member of the Clinton family received any cash from the foundation, nor did it finance any political campaigns. In fact, like the Clintons, almost the entire board of directors works for free.

I don't know how much this truly matters but long form investigative reporting like this needs an interactive online component these days. The only people who will read this much are those already informed enough about the election to vote for a potato before Donald Trump. Their job isn't to swing voters of course but you could have this whole article and graphics/interactives showing a map of where Trump has business dealings, direction of money flowing, etc. It's a simple way to get your message across to those who wont take the time to read the full piece.Phred wrote:The Crimson Cyclone wrote:CalvinBall wrote:http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html
Newsweek
ended up being much more detailed than I thought it would be, wonder if it'll have any effect?
Many people will stop reading after this line in the 4th paragragh:No member of the Clinton family received any cash from the foundation, nor did it finance any political campaigns. In fact, like the Clintons, almost the entire board of directors works for free.


JUburton wrote:I don't know how much this truly matters but long form investigative reporting like this needs an interactive online component these days. The only people who will read this much are those already informed enough about the election to vote for a potato before Donald Trump. Their job isn't to swing voters of course but you could have this whole article and graphics/interactives showing a map of where Trump has business dealings, direction of money flowing, etc. It's a simple way to get your message across to those who wont take the time to read the full piece.Phred wrote:The Crimson Cyclone wrote:CalvinBall wrote:http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html
Newsweek
ended up being much more detailed than I thought it would be, wonder if it'll have any effect?
Many people will stop reading after this line in the 4th paragragh:No member of the Clinton family received any cash from the foundation, nor did it finance any political campaigns. In fact, like the Clintons, almost the entire board of directors works for free.

I just meant as a more of 'this is how you stay alive in 2016 media'. NYT has an excellent interactive team.RichmondPhilsFan wrote:JUburton wrote:I don't know how much this truly matters but long form investigative reporting like this needs an interactive online component these days. The only people who will read this much are those already informed enough about the election to vote for a potato before Donald Trump. Their job isn't to swing voters of course but you could have this whole article and graphics/interactives showing a map of where Trump has business dealings, direction of money flowing, etc. It's a simple way to get your message across to those who wont take the time to read the full piece.Phred wrote:The Crimson Cyclone wrote:CalvinBall wrote:http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html
Newsweek
ended up being much more detailed than I thought it would be, wonder if it'll have any effect?
Many people will stop reading after this line in the 4th paragragh:No member of the Clinton family received any cash from the foundation, nor did it finance any political campaigns. In fact, like the Clintons, almost the entire board of directors works for free.
No, the key to this stuff is for the rest of the media to pick up the narrative and bombard everyone with the message.
Instead, they'd rather talk about health records.

CalvinBall wrote:trump not releasing medical records on dr oz anymore. still claims it will come out soon though.
must have been something there that didnt look good! probably advanced parkinsons.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino wrote:CalvinBall wrote:trump not releasing medical records on dr oz anymore. still claims it will come out soon though.
must have been something there that didnt look good! probably advanced parkinsons.
Body double!
