jerseyhoya wrote:

swishnicholson wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Roger Dorn wrote:People are tweeting the police are holding the fire department back to let the cabin burn in case he's inside.

One would hope

Really?

Do fire hoses have a longer range than guns?

If it's a matter of protecting firefighters, then yes it's reasonable.

If it's a matter of exacting retribution, then it's animal, and yes, one hopes for better, or at least I do.

Since the statement was "let the cabin burn" rather than "maintain a safe distance", I assumed the second proposition was being agreed to.

But I was wrong.

There needs to be more bolo ties in this country.

What if it's just the safest way to disarm this guy without costing any more innocent lives from a guy who has made abundantly clear his intention to continue to kill?
How many cops should die before burning his cabin down becomes an acceptable course of action?

That seems entirely reasonable to me and I am staunch anti-death penalty.

oh we weren't even talking about burning down his cabin on purpose. yikes. that's about the sloppiest course of action you could take outside of actually bombing it. I think all of us were under the assumption that the fire was accidentally started due to the smoke bombs. again, yikes.

also might want to drop the "staunch" from your opposition to the death penalty.

yous you aren't even arguing the facts now. you haven't answered one question

Youseff wrote:oh we weren't even talking about burning down his cabin on purpose. yikes. that's about the sloppiest course of action you could take outside of actually bombing it. I think all of us were under the assumption that the fire was accidentally started due to the smoke bombs. again, yikes.

Oh, God. I'm so embarrassed!!!

kinda glad i wasnt a part of this shit show

Youseff wrote:also might want to drop the "staunch" from your opposition to the death penalty.

GREAT point.

swishnicholson wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

swishnicholson wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Roger Dorn wrote:People are tweeting the police are holding the fire department back to let the cabin burn in case he's inside.

One would hope

Really?

Do fire hoses have a longer range than guns?

If it's a matter of protecting firefighters, then yes it's reasonable.

If it's a matter of exacting retribution, then it's animal, and yes, one hopes for better, or at least I do.

Since the statement was "let the cabin burn" rather than "maintain a safe distance", I assumed the second proposition was being agreed to.

But I was wrong.

Holding the fire department back is pretty similar to maintaining a safe distance in my book

Body confirmed to be dorner's

jim gardner says he dead

what a coward if he committed suicide

Trent Steele wrote:

Youseff wrote:also might want to drop the "staunch" from your opposition to the death penalty.

GREAT point.

lame.

Youseff wrote:

Trent Steele wrote:

Youseff wrote:also might want to drop the "staunch" from your opposition to the death penalty.

GREAT point.

lame.

I honestly just don't care what you think.

yous you didn't provide one argument. yousucked

for what? I made about 5 points then called out Trent for being a sloppy hypocrite. pretty OK night of work.

first he got fired by the lapd then he got fired by the lapd

z ipper wrote:first he got fired by the lapd then he got fired by the lapd

that's the z ipper we've come to know and know

Youseff wrote:for what? I made about 5 points then called out Trent for being a sloppy hypocrite. pretty OK night of work.

you said things like "Fire bad?", "tear gas". you made no points. you don't know if tear gas was tried, they cleared the way for the firemen after making sure they were safe, he could left the burning house, etc. you made no points.

I made the point that I don't think letting a man burn to death in a building is responsible police work. I made it clear I'm not law enforcement and I'm not sure what proper protocol is but I doubt it includes letting a man burn to death in a fire. I'm not sure how simple I have to make that for you to understand.