Wednesday was the only the fourth time that the NY Times used 96 pt. type for the headline on the front page of the paper. In chronological order:
MEN WALK ON MOON
NIXON RESIGNS
U.S. ATTACKED
OBAMA
Woody wrote:Wednesday was the only the fourth time that the NY Times used 96 pt. type for the headline on the front page of the paper. In chronological order:
MEN WALK ON MOON
NIXON RESIGNS
U.S. ATTACKED
OBAMA
Bakestar wrote:Anyone see how close Nate Silver was in his predictions? Holy crap.
Only missed one state, Indiana (assuming NC goes blue).
Off by .1% in predicting the popular vote.
Looks like "the Model" works.
Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
jerseyhoya wrote:Bahaha, my precinct in DC:
Barack Obama - 1,417
John McCain - 72
Ralph Nader - 7
Cynthia McKinney - 7
Write In - 7
McCain got 4.77%.
TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
Monkeyboy wrote:One other short thing. There's a big difference between someone saying they need to stop Bush on a baseball message board and a spokesman from the RNC saying it. Bush also had a record to oppose in 2004, which Obama doesn't have yet as the POTUS. I'm sorry you can't see the difference.
And what do my religious beliefs have to do with anything? Are you working for Liddy Dole and the GOP now? And when did I say I didn't believe in God?
TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
dajafi wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
Dean was rumored to be in the mix for HHS secretary. I think he can declare Mission Accomplished at the DNC, so the question is whether he'd like to join the administration or wait for Leahy to retire; I guess those aren't mutually exclusive, actually.
traderdave wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
I really thought Dean got a bad rap back in '04. I thought that whole episode was extremely overblown and I felt bad for him. I glad that he is getting to say "I told you so".
TenuredVulture wrote:traderdave wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Bakestar wrote:Howard Dean has to feel at least somewhat vindicated.
I think more than vindicated. I've been saying it for awhile--Dean is the architect of the Democratic revival.
I really thought Dean got a bad rap back in '04. I thought that whole episode was extremely overblown and I felt bad for him. I glad that he is getting to say "I told you so".
I actually think Dean deserves some blame for '04. But here's the thing--he learned from the mistakes of 04 and corrected them. The overall strategy was a good one--the right one at the right time when no one else noticed it. The 04 problem was tactical.
There was an interesting blog piece in the Nation awhile back--I think I posted it here--that argued that the left cannot ignore big chunks of the nation and the electorate. I think that's correct.