When Random Thoughts hits 8, you're gonna see

by **Drugs Delaney** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:49:53

Larry Literal wrote:Good point!

Thanks!

Larry Literal wrote: Far too often I see common average folk who don't know better playing fast and loose with weights and measures.

I know!

Larry Literal wrote:These people need to be called out in a public fashion and shamed for their indiscretions.

Indeed.

Larry Literal wrote: Nice work.

Thanks again!

by **MrsVox** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:12:34

Larry Literal wrote:
Drugs Delaney wrote:
MrsVox wrote:It was a brand new 100oz bottle, so it was easily a gallon of detergent.

A gallon is 128 ounces. Nevertheless, I can see why it was a huge mess to clean up.

Good point! Far too often I see common average folk who don't know better playing fast and loose with weights and measures. These people need to be called out in a public fashion and shamed for their indiscretions. Nice work.

And always, it's a good idea to passively insult the moderator/admin, who has just publicly stated that she's having a shitty start to her week.

by **MrsVox** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:19:37

And, having just put in another load of laundry, the is 300 oz, not 100, which works out to 2.34 gallons. With less than half the bottle left, it was at least a gallon.

by **The Dude** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:21:26

Thought you could get away with rounding off? It's actually 2.3434221 gallons.

by 1 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:21:51

MrsVox wrote:And, having just put in another load of laundry, the is 300 oz, not 100, which works out to 2.34 gallons. With less than half the bottle left, it was at least a gallon.

But can you take a 5 gallon jug and a 3 gallon jug and fill one with exactly 4 gallons?

by **philliesr98** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:24:01

1 wrote:
MrsVox wrote:And, having just put in another load of laundry, the is 300 oz, not 100, which works out to 2.34 gallons. With less than half the bottle left, it was at least a gallon.

But can you take a 5 gallon jug and a 3 gallon jug and fill one with exactly 4 gallons?

john mcclane says absolutely

by **jerseyhoya** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:44:15

1 wrote:
MrsVox wrote:And, having just put in another load of laundry, the is 300 oz, not 100, which works out to 2.34 gallons. With less than half the bottle left, it was at least a gallon.

But can you take a 5 gallon jug and a 3 gallon jug and fill one with exactly 4 gallons?

I have watched that scene probably 40 times, I still don't get it.

by 1 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:45:31

jerseyhoya wrote:
1 wrote:
MrsVox wrote:And, having just put in another load of laundry, the is 300 oz, not 100, which works out to 2.34 gallons. With less than half the bottle left, it was at least a gallon.

But can you take a 5 gallon jug and a 3 gallon jug and fill one with exactly 4 gallons?

I have watched that scene probably 40 times, I still don't get it.

http://www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/hollyw ... iehard.htm

by **jerseyhoya** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:53:18

Awesome.

by 1 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:56:59

boy i could have never predicted how appropriate this thread title would become

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:57:34

Everyone keeps telling me it's cold in here, but I'm burning up

by 1 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:59:00

Houshphandzadeh wrote:Everyone keeps telling me it's cold in here, but I'm burning up

put down the pipe

by **Woody** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:59:23

Cold sweats, jitters, lack of focus... oh boy

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:59:38

This rocks the house.

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:59:54

1 wrote:
Houshphandzadeh wrote:Everyone keeps telling me it's cold in here, but I'm burning up

put down the pipe

yeah yeah

by **Woody** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:00:39

Thanks. I'm working on a special new one for you...

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01:22

The House mockup never got enough credit.

by **Woody** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:12:27

Brands are created by the public, not the designer

by **Woody** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:15:07

Between the Phils' suckitude, the political battles, the crack smoking, drunkiness and adultery near-misses, BSG now stands for "Best Soap-opera Going"

by **uncle milt** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:19:48

Woody wrote:Between the Phils' suckitude, the political battles, the crack smoking, drunkiness and adultery near-misses, BSG now stands for "Best Soap-opera Going"

LOL

Archived

When Random Thoughts hits 8, you're gonna see