Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Ace Rothstein » Tue Feb 02, 2016 21:28:06

seems like a ton of money for curry

Ace Rothstein
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 96140
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 08:06:47
Location: Tangiers Sportsbook

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby 702 » Tue Feb 02, 2016 21:50:30

Really leaving no room for current free agency to fill some needed holes. Hmph...

Where is our capologist with the current numbers?

702
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 26255
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 16:41:34
Location: Vegas

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Doll Is Mine » Tue Feb 02, 2016 21:51:10

I'm so over Sanchez. He can go.

Doll Is Mine
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27502
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 20:40:30

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby rolex » Tue Feb 02, 2016 21:57:28

702 wrote:Really leaving no room for current free agency to fill some needed holes. Hmph...

Where is our capologist with the current numbers?

I was wondering this as well. Is there any $$$ around to sign Bradford? He's starting to look like a cap goner.

rolex
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:01:39

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby CalvinBall » Tue Feb 02, 2016 21:59:28

Thrilled to be resigning a bunch of guys who headlined a 7-9 team.

CalvinBall
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 64951
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 15:30:02
Location: Pigslyvania

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby The Dude » Tue Feb 02, 2016 22:02:31

BigEd76 wrote:Didn't see it mentioned, but McDermott confirmed last night he met with the Eagles and it was obvious early on they wanted an offensive-minded HC


Another wrong media report
BSG HOF '25

The Dude
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 30280
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 23:04:37
Location: 250 52nd st

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Rockinghorse » Tue Feb 02, 2016 22:29:18

rolex wrote:
702 wrote:Really leaving no room for current free agency to fill some needed holes. Hmph...

Where is our capologist with the current numbers?

I was wondering this as well. Is there any $$$ around to sign Bradford? He's starting to look like a cap goner.


Salary cap not a huge concern

Rockinghorse
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 7347
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 18:22:55
Location: Back in Philly

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby rolex » Tue Feb 02, 2016 22:37:37

Rockinghorse wrote:
rolex wrote:
702 wrote:Really leaving no room for current free agency to fill some needed holes. Hmph...

Where is our capologist with the current numbers?

I was wondering this as well. Is there any $$$ around to sign Bradford? He's starting to look like a cap goner.


Salary cap not a huge concern

Well, all righty. Let's see how this works out.

rolex
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:01:39

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby 702 » Tue Feb 02, 2016 22:50:07

McLane article pinning total control and any future blame on Howie now without the Personnel hire.

702
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 26255
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 16:41:34
Location: Vegas

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby BigEd76 » Tue Feb 02, 2016 23:28:06

PhillyPhan wrote:
heyeaglefn wrote:I think they will keep Sanchez.


I would agree to help bring along a rookie QB.


They might sign Chase Daniel for the same amount Sanchez is due to make

As for Curry, nice to see an Eagles fan and draft pick gets to stick around. Fastballs

BigEd76
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 111160
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:13:03
Location: 40.155/-74.829

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby PSUPhilliesPhan » Tue Feb 02, 2016 23:54:24

Rockinghorse wrote:
rolex wrote:
702 wrote:Really leaving no room for current free agency to fill some needed holes. Hmph...

Where is our capologist with the current numbers?

I was wondering this as well. Is there any $$$ around to sign Bradford? He's starting to look like a cap goner.


Salary cap not a huge concern


What a lazy article. No actual numbers but it will be "okay" because Howie learned from Banner.

PSUPhilliesPhan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6135
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 18:27:32
Location: South Philly by a block

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby PhillieMooDo » Wed Feb 03, 2016 00:24:37

CalvinBall wrote:Thrilled to be resigning a bunch of guys who headlined a 7-9 team.

Because there aren't talented players on a 7-9 team
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former" - Einstein

PhillieMooDo
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2312
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 14:49:51
Location: Seattle(ish)

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Grotewold » Wed Feb 03, 2016 00:29:35

Not to mention Curry being a much better fit for this new scheme. Cox too. And Ertz and Johnson will probably benefit from the linemen being able to actually get set before the snap and the QB being able to change clearly ill-fated plays, multiple defenders not crashing on run plays five yards behind scrimmage, etc

Grotewold
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 51642
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:40:10

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby joe table » Wed Feb 03, 2016 02:34:38

bring me KAEP

joe table
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 41100
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 14:56:43

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Bill McNeal » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:31:15

McLane is all fired up this morning

If Lurie had ever thought that he was going to get someone with clout or someone Roseman would end up reporting to, he was deluded. It would be naïve to think that he didn’t know as much. He had already announced in December when he fired Chip Kelly that Roseman would be on the three-man search committee for the new coach.

Roseman was the queen piece of the coaching search. The new coach knew that he would remain part of the structure and that he would have to work very closely with the vice president of football operations. Whether that impeded the search or not is unclear, although the Eagles conducted the affair as if they settled.

After flirtations with Adam Gase, Tom Coughlin and Ben McAdoo – and there was more than a flirtation with McAdoo – the Eagles selected Pederson, who wasn’t interviewed by any other team.

Lurie, of course, said Pederson was the No. 1 choice all along. Pederson will certainly factor into offseason decisions, and perhaps be the loudest voice on what the Eagles will do at quarterback, but it’s all Roseman’s show.

Lurie said in December that senior adviser Tom Donahoe would run the “day-to-day operations” of the personnel department, but the former Steelers executive is based in Pittsburgh. He might have been in Mobile, Ala. for the Senior Bowl last week, but he wasn’t visible during any of the practices.

The Eagles interviewed several candidates for the “personnel head” vacancy. They went after former Buccaneers general manager Mark Dominick first. He has been out of the league for a few years and has worked as an analyst for ESPN. He declined their offer, per sources close to the situation.

Roseman then met with Steelers pro scouting director Brandon Hunt, former Browns vice president of player personnel Morocco Brown and in-house candidate Dwayne Joseph. Any one of those scouts would have had to report to Roseman.

Most scouting contracts are up in May after the draft. The Eagles might feel they have a better chance of getting someone if they wait until then. But didn’t they know that going into the search?

It was a charade, a process once again designed to protect Roseman. His contrite news conference on Jan. 19 – the first time he had spoken in 13 months – now seems even more insincere.


http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/spor ... table.html
man I drew all these penises for nothing - housh

Bill McNeal
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 27673
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 21:05:24
Location: A Place To Be Somebody

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby 702 » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:38:33

Lol get em

702
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 26255
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 16:41:34
Location: Vegas

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Grotewold » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:45:08

Help me understand the problem here.

Howie was the GM from 2012 through 2014, with Chip probably having a big say in 2013 and 2014. Then Chip was the GM last year. I would argue that on balance, the talent level jumped in those years -- in spite of Chip's highly rigid preferences, and giving guys away.

With Chip out of the picture, why is Lurie "protecting" Roseman by putting him back in the chair? He pushed him off of it to retain a coach most of us thought was special, not for poor performance.

Grotewold
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 51642
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:40:10

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Gimpy » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:54:44

Howie is the devil and Chip is great. Yet Howie keeps hiring all these great football minds that he eventually runs out of town and Chip can't get an assistant coach who isn't off of some scrap heap.

Gimpy
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 15670
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 19:11:47

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Grotewold » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:06:45

I mean, if you were screaming from 2012-14 that Howie should be fired, OK, at least you're consistent. But Lurie didn't feel that way then and has no reason I know of to have changed his mind.

The way the media come at this is bizarre to me. They're actually angry.
Last edited by Grotewold on Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:13:15, edited 1 time in total.

Grotewold
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 51642
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:40:10

Re: Take your PEDs - Eagles - off-seasoning

Postby Napalm » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:09:58

Wheels Tupay wrote:
momadance wrote:How braindead does an organization have to be to get itself in this kind of situation? Wtf happened to Lurie?


Image

Napalm
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 61621
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 16:16:44

PreviousNext