heyeaglefn wrote:We will get em next year.
Doll Is Mine wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:We will get em next year.
Get who?
The Nightman Cometh wrote:Barry Jive wrote:why do you think it was for budget reasons? He barely gets paid anything. They probably thought he sucked at baseball (which until this year he did)
Uh, no he didn't.
Barry Jive wrote:The Nightman Cometh wrote:Barry Jive wrote:why do you think it was for budget reasons? He barely gets paid anything. They probably thought he sucked at baseball (which until this year he did)
Uh, no he didn't.
i guess your opinion comes down to how you want to frame his four below-average MLB seasons then. he plays good corner OF defense, can't play CF for shit and can't hit lefties. his D and his slightly above average hitting against righties makes him a marginally above-replacement level player. He also butted heads with management in SF. Tell me how he didn't suck at baseball
Barry Jive wrote:right, so if you forget all the years where he was bad, he's been good
RichmondPhilsFan wrote:So, this argument hinges on the definition of "suck."
smitty wrote:I had forgotten about the BSG GMs and their desire to get Youklis for 3B this season. At least he wouldn't be hurting the team from the DL.
The one good thing about this season is we have a lot of guys who will be easy to replace.
Grotewold wrote:Schierholtz outperformed Nix by OPS+ in 2011 & 2012 only slightly. And Nix only earned $250K more from us in the two years than Schierholtz did this year
Obviously, in hindsight, it was a mistake. (Not that it ended up mattering.) But the other factor was playing time, and reportedly he went to the Cubs instead of the Yankees and Red Sox and others for the promise of more playing time. I'm guessing a December 1st announcement from Amaro that Schierholtz would play almost every day in RF wouldn't have gone over super well here.
sydnor wrote:minor correction - he wouldn't have had a choice about playing time if we offered arb.
smitty wrote:I had forgotten about the BSG GMs and their desire to get Youklis for 3B this season. At least he wouldn't be hurting the team from the DL.
The one good thing about this season is we have a lot of guys who will be easy to replace.
phdave wrote:smitty wrote:I had forgotten about the BSG GMs and their desire to get Youklis for 3B this season. At least he wouldn't be hurting the team from the DL.
The one good thing about this season is we have a lot of guys who will be easy to replace.
I just looked at Youkilis's stats and his $12 million price tag. The nice thing about being a GM on a message board is that you don't have to actually live with the consequences of any decisions.
The Nightman Cometh wrote:Barry Jive wrote:right, so if you forget all the years where he was bad, he's been good
No you are right, years of recent work should not be weighted heavier. Almost no one improves in their age 26-28 seasons.