BigEd76 wrote:Former Indian/Met/Rockie reliever Jerry Dipoto is expected to be named the new GM of the Nats
I used to live across the street from him in Colorado. Very nice guy.
BigEd76 wrote:Former Indian/Met/Rockie reliever Jerry Dipoto is expected to be named the new GM of the Nats
uncle milt wrote:natinals are selling lower level tickets to friday's game for $1 to celebrate strasburg signing.
mozartpc27 wrote:TomatoPie wrote:The inconsistent logic Moyer offered did not surprise the reporters who cover him regularly. A few examples of Jamie's head-scratchers: After Atlanta second baseman Kelly Johnson homered on Moyer's first pitch of an April 8 home game, the lefty grumbled that taking the initial pitch of a ball game should be a "professional courtesy" on the part of the hitter. Huh? The batter should concede strike one?
Was Moyer doing a Bob Newhart?
Wow. So Moyer's really been a douchebag this whole time, and up til now I just didn't see it?
GM-Carson wrote:Garret Anderson had 2 hits last night to bump his hit total to 100 on the season, his 15th straight season of 100+ hits.
BigEd76 wrote:Former Indian/Met/Rockie reliever Jerry Dipoto is expected to be named the new GM of the Nats
FTN wrote:If Ted Williams hadn't essentially lost almost 5 seasons because of the two wars, would he have been the greatest player in history?
He missed his age 24, 25 and 26 seasons, then almost all of his age 33 season, and 3/4 of his age 34 season.
If you just assume he lost on average 30 HR in his 24-26 seasons, and then maybe 35 combined in '52-53, that's another 125, which would give him right around 650. And thats probably a low end estimate, as he hit 37 and 36 the two years before the war, and then 38 in his first year back at age 27.
He could have realistically hit close to 700 HR. He had 2654 hits, but would have easily gone past 3,000. Give him 180 hits per from '43-45, then another 160 in 52 and say another 120 in '53. That would be close to 3,500 hits.
Amazing stuff really.
FTN wrote:If Ted Williams hadn't essentially lost almost 5 seasons because of the two wars, would he have been the greatest player in history?
He missed his age 24, 25 and 26 seasons, then almost all of his age 33 season, and 3/4 of his age 34 season.
If you just assume he lost on average 30 HR in his 24-26 seasons, and then maybe 35 combined in '52-53, that's another 125, which would give him right around 650. And thats probably a low end estimate, as he hit 37 and 36 the two years before the war, and then 38 in his first year back at age 27.
He could have realistically hit close to 700 HR. He had 2654 hits, but would have easily gone past 3,000. Give him 180 hits per from '43-45, then another 160 in 52 and say another 120 in '53. That would be close to 3,500 hits.
Amazing stuff really.
Woody wrote:FTN wrote:If Ted Williams hadn't essentially lost almost 5 seasons because of the two wars, would he have been the greatest player in history?
He missed his age 24, 25 and 26 seasons, then almost all of his age 33 season, and 3/4 of his age 34 season.
If you just assume he lost on average 30 HR in his 24-26 seasons, and then maybe 35 combined in '52-53, that's another 125, which would give him right around 650. And thats probably a low end estimate, as he hit 37 and 36 the two years before the war, and then 38 in his first year back at age 27.
He could have realistically hit close to 700 HR. He had 2654 hits, but would have easily gone past 3,000. Give him 180 hits per from '43-45, then another 160 in 52 and say another 120 in '53. That would be close to 3,500 hits.
Amazing stuff really.
did you watch the Ted Williams HBO documentary recently? I was thinking the same things when I watched it yesterday. I never knew he missed five whole seasons
Woody wrote:FTN wrote:If Ted Williams hadn't essentially lost almost 5 seasons because of the two wars, would he have been the greatest player in history?
He missed his age 24, 25 and 26 seasons, then almost all of his age 33 season, and 3/4 of his age 34 season.
If you just assume he lost on average 30 HR in his 24-26 seasons, and then maybe 35 combined in '52-53, that's another 125, which would give him right around 650. And thats probably a low end estimate, as he hit 37 and 36 the two years before the war, and then 38 in his first year back at age 27.
He could have realistically hit close to 700 HR. He had 2654 hits, but would have easily gone past 3,000. Give him 180 hits per from '43-45, then another 160 in 52 and say another 120 in '53. That would be close to 3,500 hits.
Amazing stuff really.
did you watch the Ted Williams HBO documentary recently? I was thinking the same things when I watched it yesterday. I never knew he missed five whole seasons
The dynamo who is this man's Phillies MVP so far this season had a big stage and gave a performance to match
Eric Bruntlett and Ryan Howard