thephan wrote:

The Savior wrote:

PhillieMooDo wrote:

The Savior wrote:There appears to be a very serious whistleblower allegation from the Intelligence Community. May pertain to senior WH officials.

What's this now?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.co ... ower%3famp

Trump suggests 'innocent' Kavanaugh should sue, blasts media for 'lies'

Pretty amazing even for him

Piling on: Trump says his DOJ should 'rescue' Brett Kavanaugh

thephan wrote:I think it’s presumptive to hang it on Iran. For every reason in the world that you’ve been trained, you would believe that it would be Iran, but some facts seem a lot more than prudent.

The “you” in this case is really pretty much all of us.

The Houthi have claimed responsibility. Very unlikely it has this level of drone like capability and pulled off this type of attack without Iran’s support.

Had the Houthi not immediately claimed responsibility I would be more skeptical about other players involvement, namely Israel.

Elon Musk has the technology

"According to the director of national intelligence (DNI), the reason he's not acting to provide it, even though the statute mandates that he do so, is because he is being instructed not to. This involved a higher authority, someone above the DNI," Schiff, who is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in an interview with CBS News' "Face the Nation."

This ignore the subpoena thing has to have some legal bounds. Imperialism is not a valid excuse.

This coming-soon-to-a-"theater"-near-your-gas-pump war with Iran will certainly get Trump reelected.

The Savior wrote:

thephan wrote:I think it’s presumptive to hang it on Iran. For every reason in the world that you’ve been trained, you would believe that it would be Iran, but some facts seem a lot more than prudent.

The “you” in this case is really pretty much all of us.

The Houthi have claimed responsibility. Very unlikely it has this level of drone like capability and pulled off this type of attack without Iran’s support.

Had the Houthi not immediately claimed responsibility I would be more skeptical about other players involvement, namely Israel.

I'm convinced a nation beginning with "I" is behind this.

Trump: House Judiciary should investigate Obama Netflix deal instead of his business

Indeed, private citizen Obama is abusing his powers

the Working Families Party endorsed Elizabeth Warren

pacino wrote:the Working Families Party endorsed Elizabeth Warren

I’m sure Bernie bros on Twitter are accepting this reality.

slugsrbad wrote:

pacino wrote:the Working Families Party endorsed Elizabeth Warren

I’m sure Bernie bros on Twitter are accepting this reality.

Survey says: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... eth-warren

Cool. We can all look forward to their spite votes for Trump next year.

Yeah. Gotta love this:

“In an interview with the New York Times, Mitchell emphasized that making an endorsement decision right now isn’t just about Warren, Sanders, or whatever candidate the group is going to back — it’s also about organizing against. . .”

You may think the next words are going to be “Donald Trump,” but, wait for it. . .

“the current frontrunner, Joe Biden. He’s encouraging other progressive groups to get off the sidelines, pick a candidate, and start pushing back against the former vice president as well.”

traderdave wrote:Cool. We can all look forward to their spite votes for Trump next year.

Again, this didn't happen in 2016

i know a few



and yes the plural of anecdote is not 'data'

That sucks.

Continuing to blame voters for voting a certain way instead of the Hillary campaign for not doing their job seems misguided in general

You can also blame Comey, wikileaks, mitch mcconnell, etc. But bernie voters and 3rd party voters and Susan Sarandon and whoever else don't really deserve the ire they still seem to get from mainstream Dems

you know who most deserves the ire of mainstream dems?

mainstream dems

td11 wrote:Continuing to blame voters for voting a certain way instead of the Hillary campaign for not doing their job seems misguided in general

False dilemma. Both can share some responsibility.

Well one is individual voters, and the other is a multi million dollar campaign. But you do you, not trying to get into a silly argument about 2016

My wife and i will volunteer and donate to whoever the dem nom is when the time comes, and i believe most other dem voters will too (get in line, that is)

Voter suppression by GOP a much bigger issue that leads to less votes for dems imo

td11 wrote:Well one is individual voters, and the other is a multi million dollar campaign. But you do you, not trying to get into a silly argument about 2016

My wife and i will volunteer and donate to whoever the dem nom is when the time comes, and i believe most other dem voters will too (get in line, that is)

Voter suppression by GOP a much bigger issue that leads to less votes for dems imo

Well one is 120+ million voters, and the other is a campaign by a single candidate. But you do you, not trying to get into a silly argument about 2016.

I can make a reductionist, lopsided argument, too. Anyone can.

As for your point that "Voter suppression by GOP a much bigger issue that leads to less votes for dems imo," once again you're presenting a false dilemma. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Poor performance by Hillary and her campaign, voter suppression by the GOP and irrational choices by voters -- along with other issues -- all contribute to Democrat election woes.

Celebrating making it for a failing grade in the poll that loves him most! That is from a tweet... of course.

Upon reflection: Maybe in his childhood home, 50% plus a couple hundo to the teacher is an A. #Smartest #Because