pacino wrote:Just absurd

Release the report, doofus

JUburton wrote:Best case scenario is this pisses trump off so much he has a heart attack and dies.

The Associated Press

@AP
4m4 minutes ago
More
Mueller team considered Trump's written answers 'inadequate,' but decided against subpoena fight for interview.

JUburton wrote:There are 11 transfers of cases: 2 are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. There are 14 referrals of 'you may want to look at this potential criminal activity.' TWELVE are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. Only two that aren't are Cohen and Manafort's attorneys.

CalvinBall wrote:

JUburton wrote:There are 11 transfers of cases: 2 are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. There are 14 referrals of 'you may want to look at this potential criminal activity.' TWELVE are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. Only two that aren't are Cohen and Manafort's attorneys.

whats a transfer of case?

JUburton wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

JUburton wrote:There are 11 transfers of cases: 2 are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. There are 14 referrals of 'you may want to look at this potential criminal activity.' TWELVE are redacted as harms to ongoing matters. Only two that aren't are Cohen and Manafort's attorneys.

whats a transfer of case?

Those are the ones that have already mostly been completed/started at the federal level. SC found some shit related to the inquiry and got it prosecuted. Flynn, Kilimink, Manfort, IRA, etc.

The referrals are just other shady probably illegal stuff (Sent to SDNY among others I assume).

Mueller identified “numerous” Trump campaign-Russia contacts, but the evidence did not rise to the level of a crime.

While the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeak’s release of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation.

Mr. Barr repeatedly said that the president’s campaign did not collude with Russia. Mr. Mueller’s report offers a more nuanced definition. He writes not that there was ample evidence of contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia as it carried out its social media influence and hacking campaigns, but rather that the evidence was not strong enough to support bringing criminal charges.