hoya wrote:Is there any way this turns out better than trading Drabek, Taylor, D'Arnaud, and Donald for Halladay last year would have?
Sure, when it turns out we are trading Blanton to Seattle, not Lee.
hoya wrote:Is there any way this turns out better than trading Drabek, Taylor, D'Arnaud, and Donald for Halladay last year would have?
blueclaw wrote:dajafi wrote:blueclaw wrote:HillMD wrote:blueclaw wrote:If they were looking to save $9M, they should have just non-tendered Blanton and Durbin, rather than dump Lee for a deaf outfielder and a French-Canadian with bad mechanics. I don't think these rumors are 100% accurate...
Because Gillies being partially deaf has a lot to do with it. Jesus.
It's called sarcasm. I have nothing against the hearing impaired. He's just not a very good prospect - a heartwarming story perhaps, but a marginal prospect.
He hit .341 with speed and some power as a 20 year old in advanced A. That's a "marginal prospect"?
He played last year in High Desert, which inflates offensive statistics, and he only had 1 homer away from home. He's a Michael Bourn type player - ridiculously fast with a good OBP and zero power. To me, Gose has more upside, and I'm not a big Gose fan.
phatj wrote:Goddammit people, I just finished reading the first thread. Should I bother reading this whole thing?
So, if this is the deal, then it'd be a stellar move for Seattle. Aumont could well turn into a closer and Gillies is pretty interesting, but to get one of the game's top five pitchers for those two would be a flat-out steal and it's incredible that the Phillies couldn't do better elsewhere.
Things also look a better for the Blue Jays. Drabek isn't without risk, but he's one of the game's top-10 pitching prospects. With his legitimate No. 1 or No. 2 starter potential, he's a big upgrade from Aumont.
As for the Phillies, well, the price for Halladay is certainly fair, but they're not getting nearly enough in return for Lee. That's quite a bit of talent they're bleeding for what should be a very modest upgrade in 2010. They definitely have their eyes on 2011 here, as Halladay's extension will be quite a bit more reasonable than what Lee was requesting. Still, I don't think it was worth sacrificing Drabek's potential to get the swap done. There should have been a more reasonable deal available if they had let the league know that Lee was up for grabs.
Don't know final details, but sounds like Mariners are about to steal Cliff Lee.
.
.
weird trade. Not sure what the benefit is from Lee to Halladay for Phillies. It's like they just making deal 2 make deal
JFLNYC wrote:he plays as if his hair’s on fire. But there is one thing holding him back from reaching his ceiling of a solid everyday outfielder: his power.
JFLNYC wrote:Tyson Gillies was not a high round draft pick, nor was he a highly rated prospect heading into the 2009 season. But that hasn’t stopped him from establishing himself as one of the most exciting players in the minors. His speed is game changing and he plays as if his hair’s on fire. But there is one thing holding him back from reaching his ceiling of a solid everyday outfielder: his power.
Link
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQu6xBVfmz8[/youtube]
SideshowBob wrote:BTW, I'm still stuck on the idea that, supposedly, Seattle wants 2 pitchers this off-season... would the Phillies trading them Blanton and Happ (who reportedly "were in town for physicals" though who knows if that is true or relevant) for some prospects be that far fetched?
The Lee to Seattle aspect of stuff still seems shaky to me and sources indicating it don't see very reliable with the info surrounding it (like who would come back in return). And I find it hard to believe we'd be trading Lee to the M's unless we are getting a stud package in return (at least 2 good prospects and a throw-in) -- there's no reason we couldn't shop Lee and his $9M contract around to the other 28 teams in baseball. He should have pretty high trade value.