HALLADAY VIII: GUS IS SCRATCHNG LIKE A CHEAP JOHN

by **Grotewold** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:39:25

The Dude wrote:(2) the other option is a lot worse since 99% of fans don't care about the draft and will react to it as the Jays losing him for nothing

Seriously. I know it's irrational, but I would have gone sheep shit if we traded Schilling in 98/99 for a few Mets prospects

by **Trent Steele** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:45:04

later chump

by **lowcountry** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:45:34

JP,

It's been real. It's been fun.

Last offer: Couple of hairs off my ballsack, Happ and Taylor. Take it or leave it.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:46:23

*Sigh*

I'm disappointed, but the price is right on what we got, so there it is.

by **Grotewold** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:48:00

Laser pointer in his eyes

by **Trent Steele** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:48:59

mozartpc27 wrote:*Sigh*

I'm disappointed, but the price is right on what we got, so there it is.

You need to get it over it. Lee is 90% of Halladay and we got him for 40% of what we would have to give up for Roy.

Ruben was fucking brilliant.

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:49:49

tastes salty with a hint of pineapple but not too bad

by **Benny Lava** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:50:47

How crazy would it be if they got Lee AND Halladay.

by **FTN** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:52:42

maybe thats why Cleveland is adding cash

by **JFLNYC** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:52:54

That's why Rube got cash in the deal, so he could afford Halladay, too. :-D

by **The Red Tornado** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:53:06

keep dreaming

by **karn** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:55:26

i am sorry but we ARE world champions and AS SUCH we are ENTITLED to the very best players in the game and in THIS case that means BOTH Lee AND Halladay. We are the Sons of Jeff Jackson!!!!

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 13:58:53

FTN wrote:maybe thats why Cleveland is adding cash

Is Cleveland really adding cash? I don't know if I believe that. If they are, how much? I mean, that's like a Nintendo trade if we moved those guys for Lee, a decent right handed bat, and some of their money.

EDIT: Sounds like no cash. That makes more sense. I would have believed Amaro was using some kind of magic spell on Cleveland if he got them to give up cash too.

by **lowcountry** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:00:30

Um ... uh ... Reuben ... this is ... um ... JP. Was really hoping we could talk about Roy ... Just gimme a call when you get a chance.

Um ... uh ... Reuben ... it's JP. I'd really like to ... uh ... talk about whether or not we could do something on the Halladay front.

Um ... uh ... Reuben ...

and so on
and so on
and so on

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:04:42

I'm very interested to see how this Halladay mess now plays out. Will Toronto really trade him to the only interested party for crap? Will they really keep him? Will the Yankees get him? Hell, will the Phillies get him? I think any of these are possible, in the order I asked the questions.

I have to stop thinking about the idea of Halladay/Hamels/Blanton/Lee/Pedro. I'll give myself a brain hernia.

by **lowcountry** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:05:52

My new Halladay odds:

50% -- No trade
25% -- Boston
15% -- Philadelphia
10% -- Somebody else

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:06:59

35% - Boston
35% - No Trade
20% - NYY
10% - Phillies

by **z ipper** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:07:01

i made all these halladay graemlins for nothing :////

by **MoBettle** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:08:31

z ipper wrote:i made all these halladay graemlins for nothing :////

sell them to sons of sam horn

by **lowcountry** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 14:09:28

Olney: Sox have made no formal offer for Halladay.

Archived

HALLADAY VIII: GUS IS SCRATCHNG LIKE A CHEAP JOHN