CrashburnAlley wrote:stevemc wrote:So just to play devil's advocate, wouldn't a Halladay acquisition doom us to not repeat as WFC? The last top of the rotation pitcher acquired at the trade deadline that helped his team go on to win the WS was. . .?
I always cringe when I hear this reasoning. It's not as if there's some spooky curse on so-called ace pitchers where, if they are traded, are doomed to miss out on winning a championship.
The playoffs are a crapshoot, really. That's why the 83-win Cardinals were able to power their way through the playoffs a few years ago.
Essentially, all you want to do is increase your probability of winning. Upgrading your pitching staff with a #1 pitcher like Halladay goes a long way towards increasing those odds; the Phillies become a whole lot tougher to beat in the playoffs.
On a side note, Joe Blanton could be considered a "top of the rotation pitcher acquired at the trade deadline". Of course, it was the Oakland Athletics' rotation, in which Adam Eaton could have been a #3.
I understand that you have to do everything you can to win especially when you have a core like ours. And I think adding a Halladay brings us a championship. Whether it's this year or next, I don't know but I do believe they should go for him. I just find it extremely odd that there isn't a single recent example of this type of move working. To be honest, I think Gillick sort of believed in this approach/methodology/superstition.