Squire wrote:Took a top 100 guy undersized RW Connor McClennom in the 6th. Decent draft.
traderdave wrote:The Atlantic:
I do not have a subscription but they graded the Flyers' draft as a C.
Philadelphia Flyers: C
The Flyers didn’t have a lot of picks, but got a fair number of players who could play in the NHL. I struggle with Tyson Foerster at 22. He’s a good player, a future NHL player, but with his skating, it’s hard for me to see a top-six forward. Connor McClennon at 178 has a chance to provide value if he gets a little quicker.
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Pitlick to Arizona
mcare89 wrote:PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Pitlick to Arizona
That's a shame, I really liked him. I realize he's exactly the type of player you don't want to overpay though.
billmeltzer
Per the Flyers, Patrick falls under the 10.2 (c) classification where he's a RFA in terms of requiring a qualifying offer but is ineligible for an offer sheet. This is due to him not genuinely having 3 seasons of pro hockey. Flyers hold his exclusive negotiating rights.
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:mcare89 wrote:PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Pitlick to Arizona
That's a shame, I really liked him. I realize he's exactly the type of player you don't want to overpay though.
Totally agree. Curious what the financials are
BigEd76 wrote:Looks like the Flyers have interest in Shattenkirk