by bleh » Sat Dec 07, 2019 00:14:44
The Savior wrote:I was thinking of it as having 30m to spend on SP under assumption that bohm is your cheap 3B.
Rendon perhaps allows you to flip that via a bohm trade for perhaps a lesser commodity but still very good pitcher
by phorever » Sat Dec 07, 2019 09:04:38
by GrizzledVeteran » Sat Dec 07, 2019 09:28:52
by Stay_Disappointed » Sat Dec 07, 2019 10:00:46
by rolex » Sat Dec 07, 2019 10:08:42
Warszawa wrote:Comparing Hoskins and Franco is crazy talk
by Mike in Midlothian » Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:26:46
by Shore » Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:15:24
Mike in Midlothian wrote:Let's assume the Phils interest in Rendon is real and he signs here. What if the plan was to move on from Hoskins this offseason and move Bohm over to 1st and just deal with the early growing pains. If Bohm were to open the season as our everyday 1b next year, how close could he get to Hoskins production/numbers in 2020? Would he be a disaster defensively?
by Stripes » Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:57:51
Shore wrote:Mike in Midlothian wrote:Let's assume the Phils interest in Rendon is real and he signs here. What if the plan was to move on from Hoskins this offseason and move Bohm over to 1st and just deal with the early growing pains. If Bohm were to open the season as our everyday 1b next year, how close could he get to Hoskins production/numbers in 2020? Would he be a disaster defensively?
In 2020, he'll be, IMO, significantly worse than Hoskins offensively - 40-70 points of OBP and SLG each. Bohm hit .265 in AA last year, and hasn't seen AAA yet. But a full major league season of .250/.320/.430 wouldn't be surprising at this point. I'd probably land around .250/.360/.500 on a Hoskins projection. I don't think Bohm's 1B defense would be a disaster, but it would be a downgrade in his first year, I believe.
If the goal is to win in 2020, you want Hoskins and Rendon at the corners. Move Bohm to fill another need, or give him an OF glove in AAA.
If we fail to get Rendon, which seems likely, I think he could end up a Dodger. If he does, we could do worse than taking Turner or Muncy off their hands to alleviate their crowded infield.
by MoBettle » Sat Dec 07, 2019 13:05:25
by ReadingPhilly » Sun Dec 08, 2019 16:52:11
Jim Salisbury@JSalisburyNBCS
According to sources, the Phillies have hired Paul Buchheit as their new head athletic trainer. He comes from the Boston Red Sox' big-league athletic training staff.
by mtcal » Sun Dec 08, 2019 21:25:53
Uncle Milty wrote:mtcal wrote:Shore wrote:Shadow wrote:I evaluate him as a .280/23/95 kinda guy under normal circumstances
I evaluate him as a 5'4", 140lb kinda player, and I don't like those.
36 24 36?
Gilligan's Island?
by Uncle Milty » Sun Dec 08, 2019 21:31:11
mtcal wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:mtcal wrote:Shore wrote:Shadow wrote:I evaluate him as a .280/23/95 kinda guy under normal circumstances
I evaluate him as a 5'4", 140lb kinda player, and I don't like those.
36 24 36?
Gilligan's Island?
close. sir mix a lot.
#babygotback
by TempleFan22 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 21:38:32
by mcare89 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 21:55:56
TempleFan22 wrote:Salisbury’s latest is they want Didi (which we’ve heard) not really in on Rendon or Donaldson or Cole or Strasburg.
by gr » Mon Dec 09, 2019 01:06:41
by TempleFan22 » Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:12:37
by WhiteyFan » Mon Dec 09, 2019 16:35:16
Shadow wrote:I evaluate him as a .280/23/95 kinda guy under normal circumstances
by 76erfan » Mon Dec 09, 2019 16:46:34
by PTOITWCFTPP » Mon Dec 09, 2019 16:54:35
76erfan wrote:phils have talked to cubs about kris bryant but his service time dispute is currently a hinderance
by GMAN » Mon Dec 09, 2019 16:55:44
Bohm would have to lead the package with maybe Medina and Moniak being included??PTOITWCFTPP wrote:76erfan wrote:phils have talked to cubs about kris bryant but his service time dispute is currently a hinderance
I’m listening.
What kinda package we talking here
