thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
philliesr98 wrote:seke2 wrote:i dont really play poker much anymore
me either, too busy, why you though???
The Red Tornado wrote:philliesr98 wrote:seke2 wrote:i dont really play poker much anymore
me either, too busy, why you though???
He's in love...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
The Red Tornado wrote:philliesr98 wrote:seke2 wrote:i dont really play poker much anymore
me either, too busy, why you though???
He's in love...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
pacino wrote:huh? I didn't know sites like that existed.
What areas are you trying to improve?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
seke2 wrote:You are coachable enough.
Given the rates you have to pay for quality coaching, you'd probably need to be playing at a little higher stakes for it to be really worthwhile. You are good enough now to beat the sort of stakes you are playing at a rate where improving significantly will be difficult.
Given what happened last time you had a hot run and built a little BR, I'm thinking lessons in BR management (which is harder to coach and harder for many people to accept) is more important than actual poker knowledge.