Doll Is Mine wrote:Annie Lowrey @AnnieLowrey
Just to drive the point home: Trump has been talking to world leaders on unsecured lines without being briefed or prepped for the calls.
pacino wrote:Trump's first legislative screwup: calling for a CR instead of an omnibus. It'll just bring the matter up when he's president in march and everyone is paying attention. good for democrats is it'll delay other stuff he'd want to do. Perhaps others have a different take.
RichmondPhilsFan wrote:Doll Is Mine wrote:Annie Lowrey @AnnieLowrey
Just to drive the point home: Trump has been talking to world leaders on unsecured lines without being briefed or prepped for the calls.
In all fairness, Putin probably pinky-swore that his people wouldn't eavesdrop on Trump.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:Pence and Pelosi having a sit down/news conference? Very touchy feely, and super friendly. Doesn't that end her?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
@brendlewhat May 11
CORRECTION: This article incorrectly stated that truth existed and was accessible to human consciousness by means of language.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
To piggyback off of this, you have to wonder if these ads actually *hurt* HRC given the frustration over everything having to be PC now.Grotewold wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:-Anti Trump messaging - As noted above, a lot of people don't like Donald Trump, so this wasn't a failure, but I think they should have done a lot more highlighting his failures as a businessman. They highlighted the anti-women/minority/disabled stuff a ton. They highlighted him saying loose cannon type stuff a ton. I don't know what the 100th airing of an ad with Trump mocking the disabled reporter or them bleeping Trump swearing does because everyone pretty much had that priced into their opinion on Trump. I don't think a lot of people really understood how many failures Trump has had as a businessman. The angles that were tried on his business career highlighted his hypocrisy in making stuff overseas (I liked that Letterman ad during the Olympics and think it was effective) and a little bit about him screwing over his contractors. Don't think there was any real effort to list his bankruptcies and failures and promote the fact that he inherited a ton of wealth meaning he didn't create his company from scratch or things along those lines. People who thought he was a piece of #$!&@ in other respects voted for him because they think he's a historically awesome businessman who could use those skills to fix the economy or whatever. I don't understand why more of an effort to tarnish his business record to pour some cold water on that. It also would've come with the added benefit of driving him completely #$!&@ insane
yep
PSUsarge wrote:To piggyback off of this, you have to wonder if these ads actually *hurt* HRC given the frustration over everything having to be PC now.Grotewold wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:-Anti Trump messaging - As noted above, a lot of people don't like Donald Trump, so this wasn't a failure, but I think they should have done a lot more highlighting his failures as a businessman. They highlighted the anti-women/minority/disabled stuff a ton. They highlighted him saying loose cannon type stuff a ton. I don't know what the 100th airing of an ad with Trump mocking the disabled reporter or them bleeping Trump swearing does because everyone pretty much had that priced into their opinion on Trump. I don't think a lot of people really understood how many failures Trump has had as a businessman. The angles that were tried on his business career highlighted his hypocrisy in making stuff overseas (I liked that Letterman ad during the Olympics and think it was effective) and a little bit about him screwing over his contractors. Don't think there was any real effort to list his bankruptcies and failures and promote the fact that he inherited a ton of wealth meaning he didn't create his company from scratch or things along those lines. People who thought he was a piece of #$!&@ in other respects voted for him because they think he's a historically awesome businessman who could use those skills to fix the economy or whatever. I don't understand why more of an effort to tarnish his business record to pour some cold water on that. It also would've come with the added benefit of driving him completely #$!&@ insane
yep
I'm sure many saw Trump in the opposite light that those ads meant to paint him in - "alright, finally someone else who isn't afraid to say that out loud!"
.
@thehill
Obama won't call off anti-Trump protesters
Youseff wrote:@thehill
Obama won't call off anti-Trump protesters
should probably give Soros a call, calm his employees down.