CalvinBall wrote:the last one was a thing for like 40 minutes

not sure that blame lies on the reporter. or anyone really. school systems in america maybe?

JUburton wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:the last one was a thing for like 40 minutes

not sure that blame lies on the reporter. or anyone really. school systems in america maybe?

oh yeah, i mean trump has had daily 47 percenter moments that to a regular politician would be death blows. the sun is to superman as gross, racist sellf indulgence is to donald trump

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:the last one was a thing for like 40 minutes

seriously unless he drops the N bomb, calls Hillary a cunt, or whips his dick out in public it seems like nothing at all has any effect on his Hitler youth support

I literally think his doing any of those things would only delight his supporters.

Soren wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:The Anti-Defamation League just declared our least-favorite cartoon frog to be a hate symbol.

http://time.com/4510849/pepe-the-frog-adl-hate-symbol/

Cue the Donald Jr. retweets.

that's...interesting.

You misspelled retarded

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:You read the start of my statement, then ignored the rest where I said that she always watered down those previous statements with lawyerly equivocations.

yeah I actually ignored most of it, because it's mostly a repetition of a lame whine.

Wake me when drumpf apologizes once for any one of his normally disqualifying eruptions, without wrapping it in a tawdry infomercial for one of his glitzy dumps - or even when the media shriek about his failure to do so reaches the same pitch as it has over her inadequate contrition.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/28/books ... ottom-well

maybe the best trump subtweet yet

Gimpy

drsmooth wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:You read the start of my statement, then ignored the rest where I said that she always watered down those previous statements with lawyerly equivocations.

yeah I actually ignored most of it, because it's mostly a repetition of a lame whine.

Wake me when drumpf apologizes once for any one of his normally disqualifying eruptions, without wrapping it in a tawdry infomercial for one of his glitzy dumps - or even when the media shriek about his failure to do so reaches the same pitch as it has over her inadequate contrition.

Seriously, what the fuck is your problem on here lately? When have I ever been anything other than a vehement critic of Trump?

Hillary has a real problem with dissembling. Even her most ardent supporters acknowledge it. Hell, in that David Muir interview, she also goes on to say that it was allowed by State, how no one thought it was a problem, etc., etc.

My point about the debate response is that she JUST apologized. It wasn't an "I'm sorry, but ________." It was simple and straight-forward without extraneous details, which is something she has never done well (and a shortcoming with which I sympathize).

doc, go take a fucking timeout from the board. You really need it.

Sorry, but declaring a meme a hate symbol is the dumbest thing to happen in a phenomenally dumb election season.

poor pepe. he just wanted to feel good, man.

Gimpy wrote:Sorry, but declaring a meme a hate symbol is the dumbest thing to happen in a phenomenally dumb election season.

Still. Using that word in response to an article about hate symbols?

And you're wrong anyway. This post at the top of my FB feed just now is the dumbest thing to happen in a phenomenally dumb election season:

JFLNYC wrote:

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:the last one was a thing for like 40 minutes

seriously unless he drops the N bomb, calls Hillary a cunt, or whips his dick out in public it seems like nothing at all has any effect on his Hitler youth support

I literally think his doing any of those things would only delight his supporters.

It would. I've said before that the only thing that would doom him with his supporters would be to threaten to take guns and burning the Confederate flag.

"How Bernie Sanders could become president with only 130,000 votes"

Gimpy wrote:Sorry, but declaring a meme a hate symbol is the dumbest thing to happen in a phenomenally dumb election season.

i don't think anybody disagrees with this, but with your choice of word earlier.

smitty wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

drsmooth wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:....she finally gave a concise, accountable, apologetic answer on Monday night when she hadn't done anything of the sort in the past (even if she was arguably accountable, it was always couched in way too much lawyerly equivocating)....

I probably pay more attention to this crap than is healthy, but HRC apologized for her email decision approximately 7,328,442 different ways, at different lengths, in different tones of voice over the past few months. So "finally gave"? no.

She gave, and gave, and gave these answers, in an assortment of frames, & did it again Monday.

I challenge you to find a single public statement where she said "I’m not going to make any excuses. It was a mistake, and I take responsibility for that." She certainly didn't do it at the DNC, which was the last time that she had a captive national audience.

You read the start of my statement, then ignored the rest where I said that she always watered down those previous statements with lawyerly equivocations.

From 2015:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... ail-server

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... bout-that/

you FAIL.

he said find a SINGLE statement and you found TWO.

Bucky wrote:

smitty wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

drsmooth wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:....she finally gave a concise, accountable, apologetic answer on Monday night when she hadn't done anything of the sort in the past (even if she was arguably accountable, it was always couched in way too much lawyerly equivocating)....

I probably pay more attention to this crap than is healthy, but HRC apologized for her email decision approximately 7,328,442 different ways, at different lengths, in different tones of voice over the past few months. So "finally gave"? no.

She gave, and gave, and gave these answers, in an assortment of frames, & did it again Monday.

I challenge you to find a single public statement where she said "I’m not going to make any excuses. It was a mistake, and I take responsibility for that." She certainly didn't do it at the DNC, which was the last time that she had a captive national audience.

You read the start of my statement, then ignored the rest where I said that she always watered down those previous statements with lawyerly equivocations.

From 2015:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... ail-server

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... bout-that/

you FAIL.

he said find a SINGLE statement and you found TWO.

I actually found a bunch but only posted two.

lester is taking quite a beating in meme world today

Bucky wrote:lester is taking quite a beating in meme world today

my conservative fb friends are going ham

Bucky wrote:

smitty wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

drsmooth wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:....she finally gave a concise, accountable, apologetic answer on Monday night when she hadn't done anything of the sort in the past (even if she was arguably accountable, it was always couched in way too much lawyerly equivocating)....

I probably pay more attention to this crap than is healthy, but HRC apologized for her email decision approximately 7,328,442 different ways, at different lengths, in different tones of voice over the past few months. So "finally gave"? no.

She gave, and gave, and gave these answers, in an assortment of frames, & did it again Monday.

I challenge you to find a single public statement where she said "I’m not going to make any excuses. It was a mistake, and I take responsibility for that." She certainly didn't do it at the DNC, which was the last time that she had a captive national audience.

You read the start of my statement, then ignored the rest where I said that she always watered down those previous statements with lawyerly equivocations.

From 2015:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... ail-server

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-d ... bout-that/

you FAIL.

he said find a SINGLE statement and you found TWO.

It was a single statement made twice.