by Doll Is Mine » Sun Feb 28, 2016 16:20:07
TomatoPie wrote:Trump and Sanders are not the problem - they are symptoms.
by JFLNYC » Sun Feb 28, 2016 16:40:20
“Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke,” Mr. Trump said in an interview with CNN. “I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists.”
Mr. Trump’s lack of knowledge of Mr. Duke was surprising because he said as recently as Friday that he did disavow Mr. Duke’s support.
Mr. Trump also expressed his disapproval of Mr. Duke back in 2000 after deciding not to embark on a presidential bid in the Reform Party.
“The Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani,” Mr. Trump said in a statement, referring to Pat Buchanan and Lenora Fulani, the former standard-bearer of the New Alliance Party and an advocate of Marxist-Leninist politics. “This is not company I wish to keep.”
But on Sunday, Mr. Trump insisted that he would not condemn someone who he does not know anything about.
“I don’t know David Duke,” he said. “I don’t believe I have ever met him. I’m pretty sure I didn’t meet him. And I just don’t know anything about him.”
by Gimpy » Sun Feb 28, 2016 16:59:59
Gimpy wrote:
by drsmooth » Sun Feb 28, 2016 18:03:13
pacino wrote:That's incredibly simple
by drsmooth » Sun Feb 28, 2016 18:05:48
JFLNYC wrote:“I don’t know David Duke,” he said. “I don’t believe I have ever met him. I’m pretty sure I didn’t meet him. And I just don’t know anything about him.”
by CalvinBall » Sun Feb 28, 2016 18:08:35
by drsmooth » Sun Feb 28, 2016 18:40:20
by drsmooth » Sun Feb 28, 2016 19:03:40
by smitty » Sun Feb 28, 2016 20:43:01
by SK790 » Sun Feb 28, 2016 20:55:00
drsmooth wrote:trumo's whining to a crowd of alabama mouthbreathers about how the NYTimes is mean to him(reported facts about Trumo)
by Doll Is Mine » Sun Feb 28, 2016 22:03:17
Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders
America's first black president cannot and will not be succeeded by a hatemonger who refuses to condemn the KKK.
Hillary Clinton Retweeted
by TomatoPie » Sun Feb 28, 2016 22:04:08
Doll Is Mine wrote:TomatoPie wrote:Trump and Sanders are not the problem - they are symptoms.
Only one of them however is currently leading his party's primary.
I must say, I'm bothered by the fact that you would lump a man who has fought for many issues that the American people care about since the 1960's with a man whose campaign is nothing more than a vanity project.
by TomatoPie » Sun Feb 28, 2016 22:05:08
drsmooth wrote:pacino wrote:That's incredibly simple
Douthat tried essentially the same theme in his op-ed today. See, Obama shares the blame for trumo's existence, what with all his executive orders to circumvent a US Congress most of whose members, while respectfully disagreeing with his policy aims, stand ready to engage in responsible lawmaking with him on behalf of the American people, & all
It....let's just say it strains credulity
by pacino » Sun Feb 28, 2016 22:26:22
TomatoPie wrote:Doll Is Mine wrote:TomatoPie wrote:Trump and Sanders are not the problem - they are symptoms.
Only one of them however is currently leading his party's primary.
I must say, I'm bothered by the fact that you would lump a man who has fought for many issues that the American people care about since the 1960's with a man whose campaign is nothing more than a vanity project.
As I said, I prefer Sanders to Trump. I think he's genuine. He'd be a good neighbor. He'd be slightly less of a disaster as POTUS. But his schemes are absurd. Lots of lovely promises and no way to pay for them. yo could consfiscate all earnings and all property from every robber baron and it wouldn't begin to pay for Bernie's nobody-has-to-work-for-anything promises.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by Gimpy » Sun Feb 28, 2016 22:44:38
by Soren » Sun Feb 28, 2016 23:04:03
by pacino » Sun Feb 28, 2016 23:27:53
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by CalvinBall » Sun Feb 28, 2016 23:29:36
Gimpy wrote:I did a little reading on Tulsi Gabbard (the Congresswoman from that Bernie endorsement video). I think she'd be the perfect running mate for him. She's a young, minority (Samoan and Hindu), female, combat veteran. She's also very pretty, which would play well. Bernie/Tulsi 2016!
by Doll Is Mine » Sun Feb 28, 2016 23:29:44
pacino wrote:TomatoPie wrote:Doll Is Mine wrote:TomatoPie wrote:Trump and Sanders are not the problem - they are symptoms.
Only one of them however is currently leading his party's primary.
I must say, I'm bothered by the fact that you would lump a man who has fought for many issues that the American people care about since the 1960's with a man whose campaign is nothing more than a vanity project.
As I said, I prefer Sanders to Trump. I think he's genuine. He'd be a good neighbor. He'd be slightly less of a disaster as POTUS. But his schemes are absurd. Lots of lovely promises and no way to pay for them. yo could consfiscate all earnings and all property from every robber baron and it wouldn't begin to pay for Bernie's nobody-has-to-work-for-anything promises.
Of course, that's not at all what he's proposing.
