Youseff wrote:

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:Brantt, lets just say you're not making the average Trump voter look good on this page.

Color me heart broken.

A Trump supporter on a website full of posters ideologically to the left of Bernie Sanders.

Shocked.........shocked I tell you! Why can't I resonate?????

I'll be back in a few weeks. Iowa should be fun. Go Trump and Bernie!!!!

you can't defend your positions. you are just screaming and making sarcastic responses. it's not the board that's making you look like this, it's you.

What positions would you be speaking of that I cannot defend?

read the last page, for christ sake.

Youseff wrote:read the last page, for christ sake.

Elaborate on that please.

I mean, I had 4 posts on the last page.

One made fun of pacino.
One post where I said "OK"
One post where I asked if the Republican brass was reading this board.
One post where I said I was heartbroken that the ultra-liberals didn't take to me.

Not sure which of those "positions" I can't defend. Maybe where I said OK?

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:read the last page, for christ sake.

Elaborate on that please.

The current page is 43. Youseff would like you, for the sake of Jesus Christ, to re-read the previous page. To further clarify, he would like you to re-read page 42 of this thread.

I feel ignored

slugsrbad wrote:

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:read the last page, for christ sake.

Elaborate on that please.

The current page is 43. Youseff would like you, for the sake of Jesus Christ, to re-read the previous page. To further clarify, he would like you to re-read page 42 of this thread.

Could you be more specific please.

ok, well I've confirmed my preconceived belief that Trump fans are bigots and doofuses concerned with "PC culture" that cant defend their doofus beliefs.

ISIS leveled a 1400 year old Christian monastery

The Assyrians can never catch a break. It's obviously horrible when ISIS kills innocent people, but there's something about the destruction of history and culture that's so demoralizing to me. Fuck these people.

Youseff wrote:ok, well I've confirmed my preconceived belief that Trump fans are bigots and doofuses concerned with "PC culture" that cant defend their doofus beliefs.

Incredibly lazy and weak.

A complete bailout.

You seem to be on the same intellectual level as pacino.

These are not positive traits.

since you have the intellectual heft of a golden retriever, let me copy and paste my point.

Youseff wrote:when he says stuff, like this

"I'm a good Christian," the Republican presidential front-runner said. "If I become president, we're gonna be saying Merry Christmas at every store ... You can leave happy holidays at the corner."

which is lie on top of lie on top of pandering on top of pandering, how does any rational person not get fully repulsed? this is the opposite of keeping it real. this is being a bold fucking liar.

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:ok, well I've confirmed my preconceived belief that Trump fans are bigots and doofuses concerned with "PC culture" that cant defend their doofus beliefs.

Incredibly lazy and weak.

A complete bailout.

You seem to be on the same intellectual level as pacino.

These are not positive traits.

significantly above you?

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:ok, well I've confirmed my preconceived belief that Trump fans are bigots and doofuses concerned with "PC culture" that cant defend their doofus beliefs.

Incredibly lazy and weak.

A complete bailout.

You seem to be on the same intellectual level as pacino.

These are not positive traits.

lol


TCC posted an entire response to you that you ignored and are being purposefully obtuse about for unknown reasons.

Brantt wrote:

JUburton wrote:

Brantt wrote:

JUburton wrote:As a democrat, this is great news as I think Trump has zero chance in a general against Hillary and Cruz has about a 5%.

Maybe, but not so sure.

The big thing she would have going for her obviously are demographics which is huge.

That said, and as I predicted months ago, I think you will see a huge number of Democrats (like me) voting for Trump in the general. Maybe up to 25%. Chris Matthews has been all over this.....calls them the "Reagan Democrats." Points to the Philadelphia suburbs as the population he's talking about.

Plus you will have months of Trump character assassinations against the Clintons. Hillary is a candidate who people will look for any reason not to vote for. She's awful.

Will be the most entertaining stuff we've seen in years, maybe ever.

25%!? My word...

Quote me.........

He's polling at 20% right now in some polls.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/ ... ry-clinton

Jesus christ. This isn't a poll. This thing is a joke. For example, this is supposedly a finding of one of their two Trump polls:

When the firmed showed respondents the Trump ad, and assessed their responses to each moment of it, it found "the primary messages of Trump's ad resonated more than Democratic elites would hope."

WTF does that even mean? We're supposed to accept this as an example of unbiased random polling? Please.

Besides, if you try to find the data on their own website (spoiler alert: you cannot), you find the Mercury report on the poll, which reveals that "almost 20%" of likely Democratic voters would cross over to Trump, while "only 14%" of likely Republican voters would cross over to Hillary. We'll set aside for now the issue of whether these numbers ultimately cancel each other out (after all, the confidence index plays a part, and we are only supplied with partial results there). My biggest problem is that I always consider it to be suspicious when one number is estimated while another number is precise... and even more so when their median is already within the poll's MOE.

Bottom line, don't put much faith in this poll, if you can even call it that. They were trying to drum up attention for their firm. A good polling group shows its data.

Youseff wrote:

Brantt wrote:

Youseff wrote:ok, well I've confirmed my preconceived belief that Trump fans are bigots and doofuses concerned with "PC culture" that cant defend their doofus beliefs.

Incredibly lazy and weak.

A complete bailout.

You seem to be on the same intellectual level as pacino.

These are not positive traits.

significantly above you?

Yet the crazy thing is you'd have to come to me to try to get a job. Pacino too.

I wouldn't hire either of you though. Too soft. If you were actually as smart as you thought you were, then you'd have something.

Feel the Berrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrn.

Edit........just remember, if Trump doesn't get the nomination and somehow Bernie pulls it off, I'll be back on your "team." That's big. I need to be welcomed with open arms.

Brantt wouldn't even hire you two fairies to build a fence around his (undoubtedly huge) yard, but he'd still make you pay for it

JUburton wrote:I still think it'll be Rubio but I'm curious how the momentum thing works out.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bew ... -and-cruz/

The GOP calendar is heavily front loaded to states sympathetic with Trump/Cruz (see NH, Iowa, the south).

2. Beware an early, modest lead for Trump or Cruz. Our estimates show that Cruz would need 555 delegates heading into the March 15 primaries to keep pace for the nomination, and Trump would need 469. However, Rubio would need only 371. In other words, the GOP calendar is front-loaded with insurgent-friendly states. Although Rubio can’t afford to get clobbered early by missing thresholds in SEC states (see No. 3 below), he merely needs to stay within striking distance.

I agree on Rubio. The GOP desperately needs him to start getting back the spanish/Latino vote. I think it will be him, one way or another. Trump will agree to step aside in exchange for a 5 year contract for a new Fox reality show about his hair.

Woody wrote:Brantt wouldn't even hire you two fairies to build a fence around his (undoubtedly huge) yard, but he'd still make you pay for it

YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE.

Brantt is Trump. Trump is Brantt.

Life is performance art. Performance art is life.

Brantt, you don't happen to masturbate to anime, do you?

It's pathetic.