drsmooth wrote:You fight wars with nations. Nation states. I'm not seeing a US secretary of state meeting with anything like an ISIS foreign minister to negotiate a peace treaty.
You fight organized violence - and the ability to plan & carry out violent acts mostly against civilians is not remotely close to prosecuting a war - with....diligence. surveillance. paying attention to #$!&@. intelligence.
And even deciding to do "just" that is not easy. Because if you decide you're going to do "it", you have to decide - to argue about - all the various granular elements of "it". And in the USA, if you don't argue through what those aspects of "it" are, if you're just gonna yell "kill the ragheads!" or "the POTUS is weak because he isn't killing all the ragheads!" or some other stupid unthinking #$!&@, you damn well better be prepared to get your ass the hell out of MY country.
Now get off my lawn
Warszawa wrote:Well I don't believe ISIS will ever decide to to stop performing terrorist acts unless they meet their objective. It's also going to be difficult defeating them unless you decide you are going to kill every last one of them - which would cause a lot of collateral damage and still probably not be possible
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Doll Is Mine wrote:The fact that I'm being called a bigot says more about you than it does me. I'm a realist. And I'm getting information from someone who's actually living it, not watching it on TV from the comfort of their own couch.
What's going on in Greece and all of Europe is a problem that the locals do not want to deal with. Yes, some politicians and governments are saying the right things but the people of these countries do not want the migrants there.
And you know what? I don't blame them.
TenuredVulture wrote:Thus, a military response may in fact do substantial damage to their credibility and ability to recruit adherents.
this assertion, presuming someone like Baghdaddy has actually uttered it, doesn't exactly equate to a constitution.Furthermore, for all intents and purposes, Isis is a genocidal in its stated intent and in its actions.
...one obvious complication that most narratives I've had the misfortune to encounter in the last twenty four hours or so seem to miss the fact that Isis is most intent on killing Muslims who do not adhere to its perversion of Islam, most especially Shi'ites. This undermines both the "clash of civilization" nonsense some are spewing, but it also undermines the left wing apologist idea that all this ultimately the fault of the west.
TomatoPie wrote: