what a weird answer. it's a pretty relevant question

That's a pretty good percentage. 2 guys.

that's not the percentage. i'm genuinely interested in the answer to the question

Me too. I don't know the answer to your question. Was this just a 1 time thing or are there other instances?

American citizens have been radicalized. This isn't much of a reason to bar tens of thousands of other people from coming into the country try. We used to let in millions.

pacino wrote:American citizens have been radicalized. This isn't much of a reason to bar tens of thousands of other people from coming into the country try. We used to let in millions.

Yeah, but the Muslims in New Jersey were cheering on 9/11 per "sources".

ok, if you don't know the answer, fine. i'll google. i thought someone here knew. they also weren't radicalized americans. sorry for starting a convo

Some immigrants have done dastardly things. So have citizens. So have refugees (those darn Cubans for instance). That's not how you set policy.

holy shit. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

The Dude wrote:ok, if you don't know the answer, fine. i'll google. i thought someone here knew. they also weren't radicalized americans. sorry for starting a convo

I was simply saying that Americans have been radicalized; just like the European citizens who did the Paris attack.

The Dude wrote:holy #$!&@. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

Huh? You are misreading my posts.

The Dude wrote:holy shit. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

says the person who got defensive when someone asked a question about the article he posted.

you're saying weird things like "you can't base policy based on a few bad eggs". why? that has nothing to do with the discussion

SK790 wrote:

The Dude wrote:holy shit. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

says the person who got defensive when someone asked a question about the article he posted.

it wasn't defensive. your answer made no sense to what i said.

The Dude wrote:you're saying weird things like "you can't base policy based on a few bad eggs". why? that has nothing to do with the discussion

Because that's not how any policy is done. That's stupid. We've had a refugee system for decades. I don't know why two guys are getting you all hyped but I really don't care if you want my answer. It's such a small amount that it's immaterial to letting in impoverished people and helping them as is our duty as an incredibly wealthy nation.

pacino wrote:

The Dude wrote:you're saying weird things like "you can't base policy based on a few bad eggs". why? that has nothing to do with the discussion

Because that's not how any policy is done. That's stupid. We've had a refugee system for decades. I don't know why two guys are getting you all hyped but I really don't care if you want my answer. It's such a small amount that it's immaterial to letting in impoverished people and helping them as is our duty as an incredibly wealthy nation.

i wasn't hyped. i asked a question, and didn't get an answer but got weird responses, none that had anything to do with the question. it's interesting to me as someone that supports refugees coming in because i'd be interested to know if the 18-24 month thing was in response to instances like this

The Dude wrote:

SK790 wrote:

The Dude wrote:holy shit. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

says the person who got defensive when someone asked a question about the article he posted.

it wasn't defensive. your answer made no sense to what i said.

lol

It says in the article they constantly reassess

SK790 wrote:

The Dude wrote:

SK790 wrote:

The Dude wrote:holy shit. i just asked a question. stop with the defensive line of weird answers

says the person who got defensive when someone asked a question about the article he posted.

it wasn't defensive. your answer made no sense to what i said.

lol

Me: I don't think there's been enough chatter about this. We're there different restrictions then?
SK: so 2 people out of the hundreds of thousands we took in over the last decade?
Me: really doesn't answer my question
SK: neither does that

Lol. Neither does that.

pacino wrote:It says in the article they constantly reassess

that was 2013, though. that is why i'm asking. what is the difference.