thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:all I saw was McCarthy stepped down as an option; what else is going on??? smooth, jh?
Phan In Phlorida wrote:Ben "rush the gunman" Carson, when held at gunpoint at a Popeye's in Baltimore...
"Guy comes in, puts the gun in my ribs. And I just said, "I believe that you want the guy behind the counter'".
He actually redirected the gunman to the cashier
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jerseyhoya wrote:This is phenomenal for my dissertation
This is suboptimal for my feelings about the Republican Party
TenuredVulture wrote:The Crimson Cyclone wrote:NEW BUSINESS:
1. Budget Transfers.
2. Budget Increases.
3. Other Budget Items.
4. A resolution to approve interlocal cooperation agreement for highway
maintenance with the City of Townsend. (Resolution No. 15-10-003) (Grady
Caskey)
5. Resolution to restructure the Human Resources/Insurance Committee to provide
more equal participation of all departments and employees of Blount County.
(Resolution No. 15-10-004) (Jerome Moon)
6. Resolution to set compensation of School Board Members of Blount County,
Tennessee. (Resolution No. 15-10-005) (Ron French)
7. Resolution condemning judicial tyranny and petitioning God’s mercy. (Resolution No.
15-10-006) (Karen Miller)
8. Letter from State of Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury regarding 2016 fiscal year
budget approval. (Jerome Moon)
School board member compensation? What kind of BS is that?
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
TenuredVulture wrote:i wonder if any R reps switch parties over this. If an minority of your caucus seems bent on ideological purity regardless of cost, why stay in that party? Relatively moderate Rs in heavily Republican districts would obviously have a different calculation than those who represent swing or lean D districts, but being the majority means the party holds a number of marginal and competitive seats.
jerseyhoya wrote:That's not really true, but the party has shifted to the right
jerseyhoya wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:i wonder if any R reps switch parties over this. If an minority of your caucus seems bent on ideological purity regardless of cost, why stay in that party? Relatively moderate Rs in heavily Republican districts would obviously have a different calculation than those who represent swing or lean D districts, but being the majority means the party holds a number of marginal and competitive seats.
a) What's the point of joining the minority party?
b) Though there's a history of party switchers also switching how they vote to become more in line with their new party, there aren't any GOP members of Congress who are more left than the most moderate Dem. It's not like there's some horde of old school liberal Republicans left in the House GOP.