We're doing it, POLITICS style

by **philliesphhan** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:38:12

There you go, Moz. Saved it for the close

by **Bucky** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:38:46

mozartpc27 wrote:There it is.

didn't do him any good to take it home with him

by **dajafi** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:38:48

And there's the kill shot on 47 percent. Nicely done.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:38:52

This is a very good final answer for Obama.

by **cshort** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:39:13

mozartpc27 wrote:Also, how can China have a counterfeit Apple store? They MAKE the damn things...

Cause someone sneaks the plans out the back door. Iran has a counterfeit Apple store too.

by **kimbatiste** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:39:33

Man, great crescendo for Barry O. in that final answer.

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:39:42

wow. a complete destruction of romney.

by **philliesphhan** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:39:53

dajafi wrote:And there's the kill shot on 47 percent. Nicely done.

That final answer was REALLY good

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:40:12

pacino wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote:Obama has been much, much better tonight than in the first debate. Romney was mostly fine.

Think we're back to the typical debate pattern: whoever you are rooting for is who you think won. Romney's first debate performance was about getting the base to actually care about him and thinking he had a chance to win. What you saw in the polls was a revival of Republican interest, a belief that they had a shot.

obama clearly won. liberals stated romney clearly won the first debate. republicans just don't think that way, though. they called the VP debate even. they will call this one a win for romney, somehow. it's pretty ballsy.

I am not really attached to notions of "winning" and "losing" in debates, normally, except when one candidate does exceptionally poorly, as in Obama in the first debate.

by **jamiethekiller** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:40:49

lol i stopped paying attention with the final answer

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:40:56

Romney's body language in that shot just there at the end of the debate was quite telling, my previous opinion notwithstanding.

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:41:22

mozartpc27 wrote:
pacino wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote:Obama has been much, much better tonight than in the first debate. Romney was mostly fine.

Think we're back to the typical debate pattern: whoever you are rooting for is who you think won. Romney's first debate performance was about getting the base to actually care about him and thinking he had a chance to win. What you saw in the polls was a revival of Republican interest, a belief that they had a shot.

obama clearly won. liberals stated romney clearly won the first debate. republicans just don't think that way, though. they called the VP debate even. they will call this one a win for romney, somehow. it's pretty ballsy.

I am not really attached to notions of "winning" and "losing" in debates, normally, except when one candidate does exceptionally poorly, as in Obama in the first debate.

too bad it seems the media and nation seems to be :\

by **jamiethekiller** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:41:33

mozartpc27 wrote:Romney's body language in that shot just there at the end of the debate was quite telling, my previous opinion notwithstanding.

he looked worn down. head down and muttering

by **bleh** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:42:15

Not that I'm complaining but this moderator was sooooo biased towards Obama. Fox news won't have to make things up to complain about for once.

by **jerseyhoya** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:42:30

I think it would've been about a draw if Romney didn't completely fuck up the Libya question.

Jesus christ if we ever are OK with holding the fucking town hall in the NY metro area again we deserve to always lose. Fucking hell some of those questions tonight.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:42:43

cshort wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote:Also, how can China have a counterfeit Apple store? They MAKE the damn things...

Cause someone sneaks the plans out the back door. Iran has a counterfeit Apple store too.

Well, what I mean is... can the people who make the REAL things really be accused of also making COUNTERFEIT ones? It's like saying Native Americans make counterfeit teepees.

by **jerseyhoya** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:42:52

Liked Candy Crowley before tonight too. Holy shit.

by **jerseyhoya** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:43:53

Romney was *fine* too, which is maybe probably fine

He was very good going after Obama's record, better than he has been

by **The Nightman Cometh** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:44:06

So you think this was a loss, jh?

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:44:16

bleh wrote:Not that I'm complaining but this moderator was sooooo biased towards Obama. Fox news won't have to make things up to complain about for once.

lol ok? candy crowley is basically just a DC bubble person

Archived

We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style