drsmooth wrote:well, the whole thing has collapsed in a sweaty sort of "Falling Down" crankathon
a 10 cuts to 1 revenues solution would not cause ANY on the platform to waver from their refusal to raise taxes
let's just run Norquist why don't we
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
drsmooth wrote:Just listened to santorum's views in support of imposing criminal sanctions on doctors who perform abortions, even in cases of rape:
In what Pennsylvania mental institution did Rick Santorum come of age?
thephan wrote:Bigger waste of time: Preseason football or preseason presidential debate?
Sure some of the bottom feeders just confirmed their place, but I did not learn anything except that they all fear the tea party. A raised hand to bankrupt the country was telling.
I always enjoy the refusal to acknowledge how low the current tax rates are. Americans currently pay their lowest taxes in 60 years. Using a family of 4 scenario: average income tax rate under Reagan in 1983 was 11.06%; Clinton in 1992 was 9.18 percent; and Obama in 2010 was 4.68 percent. For seven of Reagan’s eight years in office, the top tax rate was higher than the current 35 percent and for six of those years, it was 50 percent or greater. And every year that Regan was in office, the bottom tax bracket was higher than the current ten percent. We need to pay more taxes to get us out of this hole, period. Doing anything other than revising the tax code is ignorant. The alternative would seem to be a looking for the chance to live a third world lifestyle, no services, eroding infrastructure, security concerns, massive poverty, disease, environmental catastrophe,etc.
jamiethekiller wrote:keep telling my mom that we need to raise taxes. she's keeps stubborningly saying that she already pays enough and that others need to pay taxes before they raise her taxes. says she can't afford anymore taxes. yet delaware has the lowest property tax rate and an already low state/federal income tax. i don't really get it.
jamiethekiller wrote:keep telling my mom that we need to raise taxes. she's keeps stubborningly saying that she already pays enough and that others need to pay taxes before they raise her taxes. says she can't afford anymore taxes. yet delaware has the lowest property tax rate and an already low state/federal income tax. i don't really get it.
allentown wrote:Government is partly to blame for the lousy economy, but the root cause is that we got used to a high and constantly rising standard of living in the 50s and early 60s. This great economic success was not due to anything that we did really great on the economic or governance front, it was mainly a result of all of our competitors being bombed out by WWII and the world being awash in pent-up demand. WWII also unleashed an imperial America, in which its citizens felt high from seeing their military and government basically running the world.
traderdave wrote:It still amazes me that those in DC continue to think there is any other way to see it. When you are short of funds at home, you cut back on glitzy vacations, you shop at Penny's instead of Nordstrom and cancel channels 5,000 through 10,000 on Comcast to help out. When the shortage starts getting to the point where you need to start cutting back on food purchases or you cannot pay the mortgage, you do not say, "Ahhh, screw it. The kids will just have to deal with one meal today." You go out and get a second job to increase income. This country, as the GOP would certainly have us believe, is at the point where we can no longer pay our mortgage.
I cannot wait to the see the crap this debt group is gonna start putting out in a couple of weeks. When one side goes in saying "There is no way we will agree to raise taxes", what is the point of even continuing the process?