Random Thoughts, with or without italics; preferably sans

by **swishnicholson** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 20:09:31

Brostar

by **Bakestar** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 21:24:12

You will feel the sweet kiss of my glove, sir.

by **Barry Jive** » Sun Mar 29, 2009 23:34:05

just remembered how hilarious Perry Bible Fellowship was and read every comic on the site.

oddly enough, the comic that reminded me of the site wasn't on there anymore.

by **mickbayne** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 00:44:50

smitty wrote:
ReadingPhilly wrote:some harsh weather about to come through the area

We had a little snow again last night. We never had weather like this until Mick Bayne moved here. What's up with that?

Don't blame me... I'm waaaaay over in sunny Florida!

But you're right, from my year and a half or so in the Seattle area it seems to snow just as much (or maybe even more) than I remember in Philadelphia. I didn't even have a snow brush or ice scraper when I got to WA (coming from NC it was never much of an issue).

by **Werthless** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:21:44

Need a pot-hole filled? Try KFC.

by **phatj** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:46:06

Cue creepy steagles post

by **Woody** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:04:09

Vince the Shamwow guy beat up a hooker in Miami

by **Slowhand** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:07:49

Woody wrote:Vince the Shamwow guy beat up a hooker in Miami

Somebody didn't read page 12.

by **Woody** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:09:32

Is that what it's come to? This is what we do here now? Is this what we do?

by **Slowhand** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:10:07

Well played?

by **JayBallz** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:14:28

I'm slappin' da bass!!

by **ashton** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 13:10:19

If you committed one of two crimes, but the state couldn't prove which, could they convict you for the lesser of the two?

Let's say that identical twins were caught on tape at the same time in two different locations. One was committing a robbery, the other was committing murder. They couldn't prove which twin did which crime. Would they both go free, or could they prove that each committed a felony of some sort, and put them in jail for that?

by **TenuredVulture** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 13:13:35

ashton wrote:If you committed one of two crimes, but the state couldn't prove which, could they convict you for the lesser of the two?

Let's say that identical twins were caught on tape at the same time in two different locations. One was committing a robbery, the other was committing murder. They couldn't prove which twin did which crime. Would they both go free, or could they prove that each committed a felony of some sort, and put them in jail for that?

I would think not. But surely there would be other evidence linking the specific twin to the specific crime.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 13:15:45

ashton wrote:If you committed one of two crimes, but the state couldn't prove which, could they convict you for the lesser of the two?

Let's say that identical twins were caught on tape at the same time in two different locations. One was committing a robbery, the other was committing murder. They couldn't prove which twin did which crime. Would they both go free, or could they prove that each committed a felony of some sort, and put them in jail for that?

Well, there is a Law & Order episode where two people are tried for shooting one guy with one bullet. The state knows both were there, but doesn't know which guy is the trigger man, and through some legal mumbo jumbo, though they were originally supposed to be tried together, the trials get severed and neither defendant can admit in court that there is another defendant on trial for the same crime in a different trial without also admitting knowledge that would make it clear who did it.

It always seemed like a load of bull-shit to me.

by **smitty** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 14:31:09

mozartpc27 wrote:
ashton wrote:If you committed one of two crimes, but the state couldn't prove which, could they convict you for the lesser of the two?

Let's say that identical twins were caught on tape at the same time in two different locations. One was committing a robbery, the other was committing murder. They couldn't prove which twin did which crime. Would they both go free, or could they prove that each committed a felony of some sort, and put them in jail for that?

Well, there is a Law & Order episode where two people are tried for shooting one guy with one bullet. The state knows both were there, but doesn't know which guy is the trigger man, and through some legal mumbo jumbo, though they were originally supposed to be tried together, the trials get severed and neither defendant can admit in court that there is another defendant on trial for the same crime in a different trial without also admitting knowledge that would make it clear who did it.

It always seemed like a load of bull-$#@! to me.

In this case wouldn't both be tried for Felony murder. You don't actually have to kill someone to be tried for murder if someone dies while you are committing certain felonies -- Burglary; Arson; Robbery; Rape and Kidnapping in Washington.

Besides that, on TV they can just have the CSI folks dust the air for fingerprints and then obtain the easy confession. That always works unless one of the hot chick CSIs is sleeping with someone she shouldn't be and compromises the evidence or if one of the hunk guy CSIs has a gambling problem or something like that.

by **Phan In Phlorida** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 14:38:35

JayBallz wrote:I'm slappin' da bass!!

Fish, stringed musical instrument, or euphemism?

(rimshot)

by **Ramon Gris** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 16:06:01

Phan In Phlorida wrote:
JayBallz wrote:I'm slappin' da bass!!

Fish, stringed musical instrument, or euphemism?

(rimshot)

He types pretty well with his left hand.

by **td11** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 18:35:10

great past few days for me. killed it on a pchem test, passed my bartending pour test (CHYEA), got my summer grant approved, nyc bar hopping, and i come home to find my dad got me some new speakers cuz they were on sale.

by **td11** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 18:35:39

/drugs delaney

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 18:54:24

Are you allowed to put uncleared images at the end of a paper that isn't intended for any kind of publishing?

Archived

Random Thoughts, with or without italics; preferably sans