MrsVox wrote:These four grain flapjacks I made technically only have three grains.

I like this stuff:



I'm not a fan of pancakes in general, but these are tasty. Can't find it everywhere, although I've seen it in Giant.

swishnicholson wrote:I'd never heard putouts referred to as "apprehended aerials" before.

Good SABR meeting, huh??

MrsVox wrote:These four grain flapjacks I made technically only have three grains.

Pancakes from scratch aren't all that hard. Then you can put as many grains in there as you want.

I learned that an acquaintance of ours had a boob job some years ago, and now I can't stop staring.

TenuredVulture wrote:

MrsVox wrote:These four grain flapjacks I made technically only have three grains.

Pancakes from scratch aren't all that hard. Then you can put as many grains in there as you want.

Not hard, but I've not found them as tasty as the mix that I mentioned.

phatj wrote:

TenuredVulture wrote:

MrsVox wrote:These four grain flapjacks I made technically only have three grains.

Pancakes from scratch aren't all that hard. Then you can put as many grains in there as you want.

Not hard, but I've not found them as tasty as the mix that I mentioned.

These were from scratch -- we've got VoxJr on a low sodium diet, and from scratch pancakes and waffles are practically the only way I can get some fat in him AND control the sodium (with no sodium leavening substitutes, and cutting down on the salt).

It's just funny that the recipe says four grains, but there's only wheat, corn, and oats. I guess they were counting whole wheat flour and regular flour as two grains.

Since they were a hit, I am going to try and get either some flax, or some soy protein in them next time.

Bucky wrote:Did you know that the amount of energy (HHO) in a gallon of water is
equal to 2.5 million gallons of oil?

what

What's the deal with multi grain stuff? Why is more grains better?

If you tell your friends youll meet them at the bar, but then it starts pouring rain, are you still obligated?

td11 wrote:

Bucky wrote:Did you know that the amount of energy (HHO) in a gallon of water is
equal to 2.5 million gallons of oil?

what

e=Mc^2

n/a

Houshphandzadeh wrote:What's the deal with multi grain stuff? Why is more grains better?

Some multi grains, like in bread, give you more fiber. These had extra fiber with the oatmeal, but I don't think the corn did much.

damn, i'm just miserable tonight

td11 wrote:

Bucky wrote:Did you know that the amount of energy (HHO) in a gallon of water is
equal to 2.5 million gallons of oil?

what

Yeah, what?

I didn't know either....I was hoping you guys could clue me in.

But seriously folks, I can't vouch for that exact figure, but it has to do with the hydrogen inherent in the water molecule. I do know very little water produces a heck of a lot of hydrogen. It's just that all the common methods today take more energy to extract the hydrogen than energy harvested from the H, so it's a net loss. However, there are some who claim to advanced methods which will extract the H with very little energy input. Does it work?? Who can say at this point. My F-I-L is doing some experimenting building hydrogen generators right now. I'll keep everyone posted.....

hmm, i think you're talking about bond dissociation energies-- the O-H bond has a much higher dissociation energy than does the C-H bond.

Marathon community theater session today--started with set construction at 1, ran through the whole play starting at 6, done a little after nine.

jerseyhoya wrote:Congrats

Thanks JerseyHoya.

Wood wood, my degree is in business. I'm not sure what I'd like to do right now. I just need a job to pay the loans. I guess my ideal plan would be to start dabbling in property ownership while working, in hopes of building up enough to sustain myself solely through that in 5-10 years. One of those properties would be a bar. That is my main interest so hopefully I can work towards that. Will it happen? Not a clue.

td11 wrote:hmm, i think you're talking about bond dissociation energies-- the O-H bond has a much higher dissociation energy than does the C-H bond.

It's been a long time since I took chemistry or physics, but it sounds like what Bucky is describing violates the Law of Conservation of Energy. You can't convert water into hydrogen (and oxygen) without putting as much energy into it as you'd get back by burning the resultant hydrogen.

My name is Bond, Hydrogen Bond.