PSUEagle wrote:I guess I view it like Luhnow would if he were running this team: why sacrifice another year of control when you're going to be terrible the next two years anyway? What's the difference between 95 losses vs 100: you're still bad either way.
Hate short term thinking in any sport, and that's what this appears to be.
ReadingPhilly wrote:PSUEagle wrote:I guess I view it like Luhnow would if he were running this team: why sacrifice another year of control when you're going to be terrible the next two years anyway? What's the difference between 95 losses vs 100: you're still bad either way.
Hate short term thinking in any sport, and that's what this appears to be.
they delayed his clock by a year. there was no way they could keep him in the minors until that point next season.
ReadingPhilly wrote:PSUEagle wrote:I guess I view it like Luhnow would if he were running this team: why sacrifice another year of control when you're going to be terrible the next two years anyway? What's the difference between 95 losses vs 100: you're still bad either way.
Hate short term thinking in any sport, and that's what this appears to be.
they delayed his clock by a year. there was no way they could keep him in the minors until that point next season.
RichmondPhilsFan wrote:Phillies made it official that they're not picking up CLIFF LEE's option.
my cousin mose wrote:On this day in 2007, #$!&@ was getting real
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI200709280.shtml