by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:28:57
JFLNYC wrote:There are two types of teams: On one side, those who believe you shouldn't pay a lot for a closer and, on the other side, the CWS and Phils.
by td11 » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:29:39
JFLNYC wrote:There are two types of teams: On one side, those who believe you shouldn't pay a lot for a closer and, on the other side, the CWS and Phils.
by rolex » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:29:55
Eem wrote:If the Phillies don't get a great offer, Hamels ain't getting traded. There is literally no reason to do it.
by bleh » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:38:37
td11 wrote:JFLNYC wrote:There are two types of teams: On one side, those who believe you shouldn't pay a lot for a closer and, on the other side, the CWS and Phils.
the yankees just gave andrew miller one of the biggest FA reliever contracts ever
by ReadingPhilly » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:38:46
td11 wrote:JFLNYC wrote:There are two types of teams: On one side, those who believe you shouldn't pay a lot for a closer and, on the other side, the CWS and Phils.
the yankees just gave andrew miller one of the biggest FA reliever contracts ever
by smitty » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:39:51
by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:45:23
bleh wrote:If you have a $100 million payroll, which is close to what most teams pay, Papelbon is 1/8 of your payroll. Most teams don't want to pay that, much less give up prospects to do it.
by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:49:39
by bleh » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:50:19
by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:51:40
bleh wrote:20 teams paid $112 M or less
by Trent Steele » Wed Dec 10, 2014 15:57:13
Grotewold wrote:bleh wrote:If you have a $100 million payroll, which is close to what most teams pay, Papelbon is 1/8 of your payroll. Most teams don't want to pay that, much less give up prospects to do it.
Half of the teams paid $107M and up last year. But again, everyone is reporting the Phillies will eat significant money
by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:01:53
by Phan In Phlorida » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:07:47
Monkeyboy wrote:Eem wrote:I'm ready, would be so much more interested in watching a young team take its lumps
yes, and I felt this way two years ago, too. It's time.
by Phan In Phlorida » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:08:06
Squire wrote:Rube has yet to convert smoke to fire.
by LongDrive » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:10:08
Grotewold wrote:Steaks just tweeted Rollins to LA as a "strong possibility."
by Grotewold » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:15:43
LongDrive wrote:Grotewold wrote:Steaks just tweeted Rollins to LA as a "strong possibility."
Rumor is they are trying to trade Dee Gordon.
by td11 » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:17:53
Grotewold wrote:LongDrive wrote:Grotewold wrote:Steaks just tweeted Rollins to LA as a "strong possibility."
Rumor is they are trying to trade Dee Gordon.
Oh boy
by WheelsFellOff » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:23:17
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
by Phan In Phlorida » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:23:31
LongDrive wrote:Grotewold wrote:Steaks just tweeted Rollins to LA as a "strong possibility."
Rumor is they are trying to trade Dee Gordon.
by Woody » Wed Dec 10, 2014 16:26:52
LongDrive wrote:Grotewold wrote:Steaks just tweeted Rollins to LA as a "strong possibility."
Rumor is they are trying to trade Dee Gordon.
"I'd say after last year that this is the necessary thing to do is to get young and get more athletic," Sandberg said
