mozartpc27 wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:However, I'm looking forward to the one game playoff between the Pirates and the Reds. I don't know if I'd be all that excited to watch all of a 3 game playoff.
This is a fair point, I am pretty excited for this game, although I wish the Cardinals were the team subjected to a one-and-done. The rust belt needs good things to happen, and fuck the Cardinals.
BigEd76 wrote:RAUUUUUUUUUUUUL is joining the MLB Network studio crew (along with Teixeira, Adam Jones, Mark DeRosa and Hawk Harrelson) for postseason coverage
swishnicholson wrote:BigEd76 wrote:RAUUUUUUUUUUUUL is joining the MLB Network studio crew (along with Teixeira, Adam Jones, Mark DeRosa and Hawk Harrelson) for postseason coverage
It's nice he's been able to overcome his accent and land a job like that.
Polar Bear Phan wrote:My thought on the Wild Card round is three games over two days. 5 seed hosts first game and 4 seed hosts a doubleheader (if necessary) the second day.
BigEd76 wrote:Polar Bear Phan wrote:My thought on the Wild Card round is three games over two days. 5 seed hosts first game and 4 seed hosts a doubleheader (if necessary) the second day.
The only problem is that you're asking the other six teams to sit around until Friday or Saturday for their first game (since the wildcard series would be staggered between TUE-WED and WED-THU for TV), and you can't start the #2/#3 series while the wildcard ones are going on or else the winners of those series could potentially be sitting around a week waiting for #1 or the WC to join them in the LCS
Bucky wrote:i think all this one-game backlash is forgetting why it's there: to make winning the division much more meaningful, instead of the wildcard fallback being pretty much the same. I think in this case the cure is NOT worse than the disease. and no, i didn't read the glanville article and maybe he acknowledges the reason for the single-game.
swishnicholson wrote:BigEd76 wrote:RAUUUUUUUUUUUUL is joining the MLB Network studio crew (along with Teixeira, Adam Jones, Mark DeRosa and Hawk Harrelson) for postseason coverage
It's nice he's been able to overcome his accent and land a job like that.
Wheels Tupay wrote:No offense but that sounds terrible.
Bucky wrote:i think all this one-game backlash is forgetting why it's there: to make winning the division much more meaningful, instead of the wildcard fallback being pretty much the same. I think in this case the cure is NOT worse than the disease. and no, i didn't read the glanville article and maybe he acknowledges the reason for the single-game.
Houshphandzadeh wrote:Bucky wrote:i think all this one-game backlash is forgetting why it's there: to make winning the division much more meaningful, instead of the wildcard fallback being pretty much the same. I think in this case the cure is NOT worse than the disease. and no, i didn't read the glanville article and maybe he acknowledges the reason for the single-game.
you really think that's the reason as opposed to more tv and ticket revenue and keeping more fanbases interested longer?
phatj wrote:Compared to a three-game wild card series it does
BigEd76 wrote:RAUUUUUUUUUUUUL is joining the MLB Network studio crew (along with Teixeira, Adam Jones, Mark DeRosa and Hawk Harrelson) for postseason coverage
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.