"Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoughts

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby smitty » Mon Dec 17, 2012 14:38:46

My friend the Yankee fan was bitching the other day. Telling me how flukey and lucky they have been since 1920 always lucking into Ruth and Gehrig and Mantle And Ford and Gomez and Berra and Jeter and Munson. Just a lucky, lucky, flukey team for 80 years.

Time for them to punt.

smitty
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 45450
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:00:27
Location: Federal Way, WA --Spursville

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby dajafi » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:16:11

JFLNYC wrote:We all have an understandable desire and hope that the Phils can extend and/or repeat their current run of success. But it's hard to do because it's hard to develop any young player into an elite player and to develop 3 or 4 or 5 of them contemporaneously is that much harder. And, of course, the odds are longer since we've traded away a few of those prospects (d'Arnaud, Singleton, Gose) who might reach that level. The fact that none of the guys Rube has traded away has yet achieved that level in the majors just reinforces how hard it is.

In a lot of ways it's a bitch getting older. One of the advantages, though, is having lived through and witnessed the cycles the Phils have gone through for decades and the perspective that comes with it. The first Golden Age of my lifetime started in the mid-70's and was built around the homegrown core of Schmidt, Luzinski, Bowa and Boone. That Age peaked in 1980 and had its last gasp of greatness in '83.

The 1993 team was a fluke. They finished last the year before and, after '93, never looked like a contender again. Not coincidentally I would submit, that team had only one homegrown player at its core: Darren Daulton (two, if you count Kevin Stocker). For Morandini fans, let's not forget he was a platoon player.

That means that there were 30 years between the beginning of the first Golden Age and the second in the mid-2000's, which was again built around a great core of homegrown talent: Rollins, Utley, Howard, Chooch and Hamels. I point out the three-decade gap not to be pessimistic but, rather, just to emphasize how rare it can be to put together a core of young talent capable of leading a team to a world championship.

On the positive side, of all the things which have happened this off-season, there's one that has happened and one that hasn't happened which I feel about which I feel encourage for the long run. First, Ben Revere has elite speed and defense and enough ability to get on base that he's the kind of young, controllable talent who you might be able to build/rebuild around. Second, I'm glad that (at least so far) Rube has resisted the temptation to find a vet (like Soriano) for LF. I hope that means that they intend to give Ruf every chance to see if his elite minor-league power can translate to the majors. And if it does, again you'll have a young, controllable, middle of the order power hitter to build around.

If Asche can continue to develop and Tommy Joseph and/or Larry Greene and/or Roman Quinn and/or Maikel Franco can reach his/their potential a third Golden Age could be on the horizon. I'm thankful I've lived through the first two and realistic enough to know the next could be a ways off.


I have a somewhat less elegiac version of this on TGP right now, for those interested. Plus it has a cool table measuring production vs cost of Hamels/Howard/Rollins/Utley over the last six seasons.

The point I think JFL and I both are making is that when a core ages and declines, as they all must, that's not really a reversible process. I'd add that Amaro has really only made one bad mistake: the Howard contract. Everything else pretty much has been in the category of rational attempts to raise another flag while conditions were favorable. I think--I hope--he now grasps that the game is to minimize the period until a new core can rise, while leaving space for lightning to strike if the old declining core has one more run in them.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby phorever » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:18:40

joe table wrote:


YES! :lol:


i´m trying to kill off this obsession. really i am, but i´ve been sleeping half-nights for a week dealing with a mountain of grading. (downside of working at a small new college without grad student grading assistants). be thankful i´m only falling back into bad habits, rather than a full monkeyboy freakout. i sympathize with him. grading definitely can produce temporary insanity. an i haven´t even started the stats papers yet. just wait till i try to deal with people around here mildly abusing stats after having to see them butchered spectacularly.
BRING HOME THE GOAT!
phorever
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 08:25:07
Location: the netherlands

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby smitty » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:23:26

Good points being made here actually. I agree that the Howard contract looks to be the one big mistake. Pretty much every team seems to want to make at least one mistake like this,so I don't get incredibly worked up about it.

The Phils didn't just sit on their core all these years though. They went out and got Roy and Lee and Papelbon The starters have been two of the top six or seven pitchers in MLB over the last many years and Papelbon has been elite.

If Adams is healthy, they have a decent chance of having the best bullpen in the league next season.

I think the Phils are still a contender right now. If they make one more good move they can be more than that.

smitty
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 45450
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:00:27
Location: Federal Way, WA --Spursville

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Grotewold » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:24:09

dajafi wrote:I think--I hope--he now grasps that the game is to minimize the period until a new core can rise, while leaving space for lightning to strike if the old declining core has one more run in them.


That's what I've been thinking, but better put

Grotewold
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 51642
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:40:10

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby JFLNYC » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:56:41

I should stop being lazy and read TGP.
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby phorever » Mon Dec 17, 2012 15:58:25

dajafi wrote:
The point I think JFL and I both are making is that when a core ages and declines, as they all must, that's not really a reversible process. I'd add that Amaro has really only made one bad mistake: the Howard contract. Everything else pretty much has been in the category of rational attempts to raise another flag while conditions were favorable. I think--I hope--he now grasps that the game is to minimize the period until a new core can rise, while leaving space for lightning to strike if the old declining core has one more run in them.


i agree with the gist of this, but i think that there were other bad mistakes. first a reminder of some of the too often forgotten successes. in addition to the moves for lee, pedro, halladay, oswalt, and lee again, he signed madson, victorino, werth and ruiz to contracts that worked out really, really well, and resisted the temptation to keep and overpay werth and victorino and madson. if you believe uzr, he also got more than his money´s worth from polanco, despite the injuries. the blanton contract looked pretty darn good before joe got hurt.

however he not only gave howard a huge and unnecessary contract... he did the same for lidge. that took up payroll space that would have let him hold on to the extra prospects he gave up to save money on oswalt and pence. the ridiculous extra year for ibanez didn´t help either. to add to the prospect woes it still remains to be seen whether or not he got anything of value in lee trade 2. without those mistakes he would have had the prospects to deal for headley last offseason when he knew polly was cooked, or justin upton this offseason.

[i´ll leave the papelbon contract out of it for now, though it easily could be blamed for not being able to get upton/hamilton/swish. i haven´t made up my mind yet about that one... i need to take a closer look at the predictive ability of the leveraged value stats for relievers, upon which i had based my positive take on that deal]
BRING HOME THE GOAT!
phorever
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 3785
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 08:25:07
Location: the netherlands

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Soren » Mon Dec 17, 2012 16:07:33

JFLNYC wrote:I should stop being lazy and read TGP.
Olivia Meadows, your "emotional poltergeist"

Soren
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 39874
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 13:44:19
Location: area x

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Wizlah » Mon Dec 17, 2012 17:36:00

a really sound piece, dajafi. And surprising to see how positively the other tgp'ers respond.

I don't like the lannan deal, mainly because I'm fretting that rube is out of ideas and just spending cash for the sake of it. Posts like yours plead a convincing counter-argument.

The season could well suck worse than the last, and drive us all into spewing lunacy, but if he's prudently restocking options down on the farm I will take the misery every time.

Wizlah
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 13199
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 09:50:15
Location: Lost in law, god help me.

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Wizlah » Mon Dec 17, 2012 17:43:57

a really sound piece, dajafi. And surprising to see how positively the other tgp'ers respond.

I don't like the lannan deal, mainly because I'm fretting that rube is out of ideas and just spending cash for the sake of it. Posts like yours plead a convincing counter-argument.

The season could well suck worse than the last, and drive us all into spewing lunacy, but if he's prudently restocking options down on the farm I will take the misery every time.

Wizlah
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 13199
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 09:50:15
Location: Lost in law, god help me.

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Wheels Tupay » Mon Dec 17, 2012 18:36:57

dajafi wrote:
JFLNYC wrote:We all have an understandable desire and hope that the Phils can extend and/or repeat their current run of success. But it's hard to do because it's hard to develop any young player into an elite player and to develop 3 or 4 or 5 of them contemporaneously is that much harder. And, of course, the odds are longer since we've traded away a few of those prospects (d'Arnaud, Singleton, Gose) who might reach that level. The fact that none of the guys Rube has traded away has yet achieved that level in the majors just reinforces how hard it is.

In a lot of ways it's a bitch getting older. One of the advantages, though, is having lived through and witnessed the cycles the Phils have gone through for decades and the perspective that comes with it. The first Golden Age of my lifetime started in the mid-70's and was built around the homegrown core of Schmidt, Luzinski, Bowa and Boone. That Age peaked in 1980 and had its last gasp of greatness in '83.

The 1993 team was a fluke. They finished last the year before and, after '93, never looked like a contender again. Not coincidentally I would submit, that team had only one homegrown player at its core: Darren Daulton (two, if you count Kevin Stocker). For Morandini fans, let's not forget he was a platoon player.

That means that there were 30 years between the beginning of the first Golden Age and the second in the mid-2000's, which was again built around a great core of homegrown talent: Rollins, Utley, Howard, Chooch and Hamels. I point out the three-decade gap not to be pessimistic but, rather, just to emphasize how rare it can be to put together a core of young talent capable of leading a team to a world championship.

On the positive side, of all the things which have happened this off-season, there's one that has happened and one that hasn't happened which I feel about which I feel encourage for the long run. First, Ben Revere has elite speed and defense and enough ability to get on base that he's the kind of young, controllable talent who you might be able to build/rebuild around. Second, I'm glad that (at least so far) Rube has resisted the temptation to find a vet (like Soriano) for LF. I hope that means that they intend to give Ruf every chance to see if his elite minor-league power can translate to the majors. And if it does, again you'll have a young, controllable, middle of the order power hitter to build around.

If Asche can continue to develop and Tommy Joseph and/or Larry Greene and/or Roman Quinn and/or Maikel Franco can reach his/their potential a third Golden Age could be on the horizon. I'm thankful I've lived through the first two and realistic enough to know the next could be a ways off.


I have a somewhat less elegiac version of this on TGP right now, for those interested. Plus it has a cool table measuring production vs cost of Hamels/Howard/Rollins/Utley over the last six seasons.

The point I think JFL and I both are making is that when a core ages and declines, as they all must, that's not really a reversible process. I'd add that Amaro has really only made one bad mistake: the Howard contract. Everything else pretty much has been in the category of rational attempts to raise another flag while conditions were favorable. I think--I hope--he now grasps that the game is to minimize the period until a new core can rise, while leaving space for lightning to strike if the old declining core has one more run in them.


Rube has already started the proess of starting the new core. He is using Young as a stop gap and handing third base to Asche. He aqcuired Revere. He is going to give at least one of Dom or Ruf a shot this season. The bullpen began at the end of last year when he gave Diek, Aumont etc spots. It looks like Joseph may be getting a shot in the near future too.
"That’s the Southwest Philly floater, man."
Now imagine that everything you ever imagined... is possible. - Hinkieology
EDP 2020

Wheels Tupay
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 30615
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 16:35:17
Location: Keepin' it Gritty.

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby JFLNYC » Mon Dec 17, 2012 20:03:46

Have to say that, for me, the worst part of the off-season so far is the Mets getting d'Arnaud.
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Woody » Mon Dec 17, 2012 20:35:50

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elegiac

Fucking dajafi

Woody
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 52472
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 17:56:45
Location: captain of the varsity slut team

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby smitty » Mon Dec 17, 2012 20:55:22

Elegiac would be a good name for a strong safety or a sewer worker. If there was a sewer worker named Scott Elegiac who went to college and played strong safety the Eagles would draft him in the second round I bet.

smitty
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 45450
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:00:27
Location: Federal Way, WA --Spursville

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby dajafi » Mon Dec 17, 2012 21:00:31

phorever wrote:
dajafi wrote:
The point I think JFL and I both are making is that when a core ages and declines, as they all must, that's not really a reversible process. I'd add that Amaro has really only made one bad mistake: the Howard contract. Everything else pretty much has been in the category of rational attempts to raise another flag while conditions were favorable. I think--I hope--he now grasps that the game is to minimize the period until a new core can rise, while leaving space for lightning to strike if the old declining core has one more run in them.


i agree with the gist of this, but i think that there were other bad mistakes. first a reminder of some of the too often forgotten successes. in addition to the moves for lee, pedro, halladay, oswalt, and lee again, he signed madson, victorino, werth and ruiz to contracts that worked out really, really well, and resisted the temptation to keep and overpay werth and victorino and madson. if you believe uzr, he also got more than his money´s worth from polanco, despite the injuries. the blanton contract looked pretty darn good before joe got hurt.

however he not only gave howard a huge and unnecessary contract... he did the same for lidge. that took up payroll space that would have let him hold on to the extra prospects he gave up to save money on oswalt and pence. the ridiculous extra year for ibanez didn´t help either. to add to the prospect woes it still remains to be seen whether or not he got anything of value in lee trade 2. without those mistakes he would have had the prospects to deal for headley last offseason when he knew Polanco was cooked, or justin upton this offseason.

[i´ll leave the papelbon contract out of it for now, though it easily could be blamed for not being able to get upton/hamilton/swish. i haven´t made up my mind yet about that one... i need to take a closer look at the predictive ability of the leveraged value stats for relievers, upon which i had based my positive take on that deal]


Pretty sure the Lidge contract is on Gillick--my memory is that it was announced around the ASB in 2008.

As for the other stuff, an extra year for Ibanez or Polanco or including this or that third piece in the deal strike me as the sort of mistakes every GM makes. I think I wrote on BSG a few years back that Shapiro of Cleveland was in my opinion the best GM in the majors... and he got just north of totally fucking nothing in back to back deals of Cy Young winners.

They *all* screw up, is the point. The best ones as well as the worst. Beane presumably regrets giving up CarGo. Sabean's overpay for Zito was as bad as Ruben's for Howard. Seattle looked a lot less smart after Figgins cratered. Mozeliak gave away Luke Gregerson and Chris Perez. The bad ones either make the same mistakes over and over again, or simply have no strategy at all. This is why Pittsburgh and Kansas City can't get out of the woods.

As I've looked at it and thought about it, I've concluded that Amaro had the right approach from 2009 through last winter, when he had a great core and a real shot to win another title. Pence was an overpay, and probably his second-worst move after the Howard contract, but it wasn't illogical. The deals for Lee, Halladay and Oswalt were well considered. (The deal trading Lee away wasn't, and without it, there wouldn't have been a need for Oswalt... but I'm still not totally certain Aumont and Gillies won't prove worthwhile guys to have.) The Phils went into the playoffs in each of those years as NL favorites, and were about as unlucky in this or that series as they were lucky in 2008 (when they avoided the toughest teams and Hamels got to start Game One in every series).

The team's circumstances have changed, so his strategy seems to have changed. Last summer we were worried he'd either not move his inventory or get a shit return; neither proved correct, as today's BA prospect list suggests. Joseph is the second best position prospect in the system, and Martin's emergence made it possible to move May. This ability both to shift approach and to do it reasonably well is the other thing that suggests he's not the drooling moron many here make him out to be after every single move. At the same time, if they're close at the deadline this summer, he'll probably have both the payroll flexibility and the prospect inventory to make another big move.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby smitty » Mon Dec 17, 2012 21:38:09

That makes an awful lot of sense to me DAJ.

smitty
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 45450
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:00:27
Location: Federal Way, WA --Spursville

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby JFLNYC » Mon Dec 17, 2012 22:04:00

Woody wrote:en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elegiac

Fucking dajafi


I knew I wasn't feeling well, but I just couldn't put my finger on it.
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Rev_Beezer » Mon Dec 17, 2012 22:09:24

So we're seriously second guessing the best years the franchise has ever had, then? Just checking.
Together we will win this game against the evil Space Yankees! Eat Fresh!

Rev_Beezer
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 7362
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 20:14:03
Location: Shamokin, PA

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby Napalm » Mon Dec 17, 2012 22:16:31

384 flukey wins over 4 flukey years. look at the previous 100 seasons breh

Napalm
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 61625
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 16:16:44

Re: "Still have our 1st-rd pick!" & other random Phils thoug

Postby The Dude » Mon Dec 17, 2012 22:31:41

i bet there's a scene in hobbit where tard board ownership changes hands
BSG HOF '25

The Dude
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 30280
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 23:04:37
Location: 250 52nd st

PreviousNext