mozartpc27 wrote:Some nice information on Brett Myers, for those who like him, as part of a broader article praising the Astros new direction and GM Ed Wade's in-season adjustments:Steve Berthiaume wrote:The Astros' biggest rotation success story has been Brett Myers. Not only did Wade not deal Myers at the deadline, he signed him to an extension. Myers will make $7 million in 2011 and $11 million in 2012. The Astros hold a $10 million option for 2013. Myers has been pitching's untold story in the year of the pitcher. He's gone at least six innings in all 31 of his starts this season, a franchise record and the longest such streak to begin a season since Curt Schilling went at least six innings in his first 35 appearances in 2002. Myers is only the third starting pitcher since 1980 to begin a season with at least 31 straight starts of at least six innings. This season, he's 8-0 at home with a 2.01 ERA. Houston's 2011 rotation -- built around Myers, Rodriguez, Happ and Norris -- is enough to win the NL Central.
Berthiaume is excited for the future prospects of these Astros:Steve Berthiaume wrote:Now, exactly how much progress has been gleaned by all these midseason personnel changes? Let's get back to that 17-34 mark. Since then, the Astros have gone 55-43. From starting 0-8 and 17-34, Houston has scrambled back to within five games of .500. It's been a steady progression: 14-14 in June, 13-11 in July, 17-12 in August and now 11-6 in September. The Astros have pulled off a major, midseason remodeling job. And, looking ahead to next year, they will have less than $40 million committed to payroll for the 2011 season. So there is room to add talent to the mix this winter. Make room in there somewhere for a division title.
Ed Wade: Genius.
In all seriousness, the only-$40M-in-payroll-committments for 2011 with a team with a decent or perhaps even above average starting rotation is pretty impressive. Maybe Wade isn't a total fool after all.
The Eeming Tree wrote:Wade actually has done an OK job there, I think.
Especially for us.
mozartpc27 wrote:The Eeming Tree wrote:Wade actually has done an OK job there, I think.
Especially for us.
I still say he did an OK job here. I know he wasn't directly in charge of scouting and player development, but when he came in he made it clear that he was going to do a complete overhaul of the Phillies minor league system. In that "Phillies Memories" DVD I picked up down at CBP, Jayson Stark talked about the difference Ed Wade made. RAJ also mentioned that when Wade came in, one of the first things hehad to do was really clean house and fire a whole bunch of people. It took a long time for the Phils to get where they are, and Wade definitely deserves some credit for part of that. Obviously, Gillick turned out to be the superior in-season tweaker GM, but Wade obviously had strong spots for organizational development and running arbitration hearings.
lethal wrote:mozartpc27 wrote:The Eeming Tree wrote:Wade actually has done an OK job there, I think.
Especially for us.
I still say he did an OK job here. I know he wasn't directly in charge of scouting and player development, but when he came in he made it clear that he was going to do a complete overhaul of the Phillies minor league system. In that "Phillies Memories" DVD I picked up down at CBP, Jayson Stark talked about the difference Ed Wade made. RAJ also mentioned that when Wade came in, one of the first things hehad to do was really clean house and fire a whole bunch of people. It took a long time for the Phils to get where they are, and Wade definitely deserves some credit for part of that. Obviously, Gillick turned out to be the superior in-season tweaker GM, but Wade obviously had strong spots for organizational development and running arbitration hearings.
Plus Wade never traded away prime prospects. He held onto them like gold. Sure you heard rumors like Ryan Howard for Kip Wells or Chase Utley for Barry Zito or something, but they never happened.
He didn't do so well when he traded major leaguers away, but he held onto the blue chip minor leaguers who are now the stars of the Phillies.
mozartpc27 wrote:... but Wade obviously had strong spots for organizational development and running arbitration hearings.
djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
joe table wrote:I don't know guys, Wade's last offseason was pretty questionable. They actually spent a decent amount of money compared to most of the league, and mostly on veteran filler
Lyon: 3-15mm. Gross, and beyond that, just shows a deeper lack of understanding (familiar to all of us) about the importance/value of middle relievers
Petey F (respek): 1-4.5mm. I guess they needed a seat filler, but that's too much for Pete, especially with how the market ended up shaking out (F Lopez, better player, had to sign for half that. They also had some cheaper incumbents of Feliz-ish quality, specifically Jeff Keppinger. And Chris Johnson who eventually got called up and did well
Myers- 1-5.1mm. Ended up being a very nice deal. We'll see if the 2-23 with a vesting option for 2013 works out as well, but it seems fairly reasonable (albeit without much upside) if he stays healthy
Apparently they've had some nice drafts lately, but giving Wade all the credit for that would be like if we gave Amaro all the props for our draft gems when he's really out playing golf and telling Wolever to draft any eligible nephews
djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
utley was blocked b/c Polanco was a stubborn space cadet. howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
mozartpc27 wrote:djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
utley was blocked b/c Polanco was a stubborn space cadet. howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
You mean Polanco wouldn't play third?
djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
djbigf wrote:mozartpc27 wrote:djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
utley was blocked b/c Polanco was a stubborn space cadet. howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
You mean Polanco wouldn't play third?
nope. he said as much. it's why he was traded.
mozartpc27 wrote:Or maybe... *gasp*... it was DAVID $#@!-ING BELL'S FAULT FOR EXISTING.
WilliamC wrote:djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
If only...
mozartpc27 wrote:djbigf wrote:mozartpc27 wrote:djbigf wrote:Phan In Phlorida wrote:djbigf wrote:utley and howard were in the minors way too long.
Both were kinda blocked at the major league level (Thome & Polanco) around the time they shoulda/coulda been up.
utley was blocked b/c Polanco was a stubborn space cadet. howard could've been dealt for players that would've gotten them over the hump but no-trade wouldn't pull the trigger.
You mean Polanco wouldn't play third?
nope. he said as much. it's why he was traded.
He'd played third here since 2002. Citation, or it didn't happen.
joe table wrote:I don't know guys, Wade's last offseason was pretty questionable. They actually spent a decent amount of money compared to most of the league, and mostly on veteran filler