The OLD Halladay/Smug thread is HERE

by **joe table** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:16:52

If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

by **Soren** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:17:16

joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

too busy fapping to answer

by **laf837** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:18:08

JFLNYC wrote:
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:why not trade Blanton for whatever, clear up almost the same monsy, give up a few prospects for Halladay and sign him and have Lee for this year, get two picks in 2011?

I still haven't given up hope that's the way it goes down.

I doubt the $ is the sticking point in this, it's the mix of prospects. Wasn't going to happen unless Drabek was included or a suitable replacement, ala Morrow. Amaro is not giving up Drabek. Can't get Morrow without Lee.

by **lowcountry** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:18:33

joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

Fark. That.

by **JFLNYC** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:18:39

joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

Not best scenario, but I'm OK with it if there wasn't any other way to get it done, especially if it means we keep both Blanton and Happ.

by **Grotewold** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:18:44

PSUsarge wrote:
Grotewold wrote:
Woody wrote:So we get Halladay, money for Halladay, and a relief pitcher. What, no blowjobs or strombolis?

toronto naming rights: the amaro center

or centre

Centro

by **Doll Is Mine** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:19:16

joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

If Lee is going, I want no part of Taylor or Brown in that deal. I would think one of the purposes of trading Lee is to avoid trading Taylor and Brown.

by **dajafi** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:19:25

lowcountry wrote:
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:why not trade Blanton for whatever, clear up almost the same monsy, give up a few prospects for Halladay and sign him and have Lee for this year, get two picks in 2011?

^^^^^^
thisthisthisthisthisthisthisTHIS

/yes
//this

But one year of Lee in this situation could be equivalent to Drabek + Brown, who stand a good chance of being quality major-leaguers while saving the payroll from ~2011-2013.

I'm all about winning next year, as I wrote a few pages back, but I understand and am glad that Smuggles feels otherwise.

by **Doll Is Mine** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:19:56

ek wrote:3) haven't heard a blanton scenario

Can you look again? Maybe you missed it.

by **CFP** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:20:16

Heard Halladay willing to take extension at less than CC/Santana to be on winner/be near Fla home, and #Phillies train nearby in Clearwater

Sherman

by **CalvinBall** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:20:33

TRT what is your source saying?

by **joe table** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:20:47

Doll Is Mine wrote:
joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

If Lee is going, I want no part of Taylor or Brown in that deal. I would think one of the purposes of trading Lee is to avoid trading Taylor and Brown.

I think Lee would help them get another pitching prospect that TOR likes so we can keep Drabek

by **The Crimson Cyclone** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:20:55

CalvinBall wrote:TRT what is your source saying?

my source is only available Thursdays

by **FTN** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:21:18

ek wrote:apparently the two scenarios are

1) three way deal with Seattle with Lee involved
2) regular trade with TOR for various prospects (don't know who)
3) haven't heard a blanton scenario

ill take #2

by **Trent Steele** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:22:29

FTN wrote:
ek wrote:apparently the two scenarios are

1) three way deal with Seattle with Lee involved
2) regular trade with TOR for various prospects (don't know who)
3) haven't heard a blanton scenario

ill take #2

but will you take No. 1 instead of the status quo?

by **phorever** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:22:30

joe table wrote:If it's Taylor or Brown, plus Lee (to a 3rd team with more prospects to TOR) with Halladay and a middle reliever back, plus huge extension people are good with it?

i want a good ss prospect back much, much more than i want a middle reliever.

by **lowcountry** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:22:39

Drabek better be the @#@#$ truth.

by **JFLNYC** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:22:46

FTN wrote:
ek wrote:apparently the two scenarios are

1) three way deal with Seattle with Lee involved
2) regular trade with TOR for various prospects (don't know who)
3) haven't heard a blanton scenario

ill take #2

That's what I'm hoping. If RAJ gets some $$ back from TOR and gets Halladay to defer some 2010 $$, maybe we get our best-case scenario.

by **JFLNYC** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:23:43

Trent Steele wrote:
FTN wrote:
ek wrote:apparently the two scenarios are

1) three way deal with Seattle with Lee involved
2) regular trade with TOR for various prospects (don't know who)
3) haven't heard a blanton scenario

ill take #2

but will you take No. 1 instead of the status quo?

"He'll take it and love it."

~ RAJ

by **lowcountry** » Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:24:05

Trent Steele wrote:but will you take No. 1 instead of the status quo?

I'd rather take a stab at signing Halladay as a FA than lose Lee now.

Archived

The OLD Halladay/Smug thread is HERE