Werthless wrote:I don't think the American public needs a play-by-play of the President's health. It's not in the interest of the US, it's not in the interest of the President, and it's not in the interest of national security for hourly updates. Who does that serve, besides our own morbid curiosity? Is he healthy enough to be in charge, or no? That's the question that matters, and the decision-makers who should have that information are the cabinet. Anyone else, it's on an as-needed basis.
If Obama was sick, what information would we demand? Would we demand what treatment he received? No, of course not. If Trump chooses to share more, then he's welcome to.
Yeh, this is where I am. It's not that bad to me to have some misinformation on this particular issue because we do have enemies around the world that might try to take advantage. Of course, most of those countries are either working with Trump to steal the election or have spies to know what's really happening, but I can't get too bent out of shape about it.
His comment about the virus not being that serious, on the other hand, is horrifying and reckless.
I hate to say it and I couldn't bring myself to actually root for it, but the only thing that might stop him painting a rosy picture is a death or two out of the group that's sick. He'll look like even more of a monster if Barr or someone dies and he's still spouting off about how it wasn't that bad. I'm worried about the Notre Dame guy.
