jamiethekiller wrote:Let's hope they all come with secrecy envelopes
Augustus wrote:Crazy to think that we're voting on whether to remain a democracy or to go back to being a white Christian ethnostate but here we are
Bucky wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:Let's hope they all come with secrecy envelopes
true story: my primary ballot didn't come with one. I got in touch with montco treasurer jason salus on fb and he advised to just use any plain white envelope.
Bucky wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:Let's hope they all come with secrecy envelopes
true story: my primary ballot didn't come with one. I got in touch with montco treasurer jason salus on fb and he advised to just use any plain white envelope.
06hawkalum wrote:Bucky wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:Let's hope they all come with secrecy envelopes
true story: my primary ballot didn't come with one. I got in touch with montco treasurer jason salus on fb and he advised to just use any plain white envelope.
Surely those whose ballots are being thrown out will be notified and provided a new ballot...right?
1 wrote:The fix is in
Wolfgang622 wrote:1 wrote:The fix is in
Isn't the PA Supreme Court 7-2 Dem?
jerseyhoya wrote:Wolfgang622 wrote:1 wrote:The fix is in
Isn't the PA Supreme Court 7-2 Dem?
Try adding four more
JFLNYC wrote:So the PA Supreme Court has ruled that naked mail in ballots (those without secrecy envelopes) are invalid. Estimates are that 100,000 mail in ballots could be tossed out.
CFP wrote:I've tried to find the anger and frustration about this news but am just not feeling it. If you can't read the gigantic font that says please put your ballot inside the secrecy envelope I don't know what to say. It was fairly easy to follow in the spring and frankly if you're that stupid your vote shouldn't count. There's my hot take.
philliesphhan wrote:Seems like they should have ruled on that before so many ballots were already cast