CalvinBall wrote:Rumors swirling that session in Harrisburg is delayed because four members of the House GOP have COVID.

Monkeyboy wrote:

traderdave wrote:I know COVID-19 is a very big deal but I hope that people are keeping their eyes open to other happenings because the very foundation of our country, our way of life, is shifting in the sands of this administration:

@realDonaldTrump
Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen. We saw what they attempted to do, and failed, in 2016. We can’t let a more sophisticated version of that....
7:11 AM · May 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

@realDonaldTrump
....happen again. Just like we can’t let large scale Mail-In Ballots take root in our Country. It would be a free for all on cheating, forgery and the theft of Ballots. Whoever cheated the most would win. Likewise, Social Media. Clean up your act, NOW!!!!
7:11 AM · May 27, 2020·Twitter for iPhone

This is a US president talking about taking governmental action to shut down private businesses. Why? Because Twitter called him out on ONE of the steady stream of lies he has told over the past four+ years. This is also a US president advocating against free and fair elections, i.e. democracy. Americans must remain vigilant!!

He doesn't like mail-in ballots because he doesn't want paper trails.

td11 wrote:

SwingOnThis wrote:It's important that Biden have an insulting nickname for Trump and hammer it home every chance he gets. Anything that emasculates Trump is important, no matter how childish it may seem.

Diaper Don

thephan wrote:Its hard to believe at this moment in time that the President is going to issue an executive order around Social Media.

What a butt hurt infant this donkey is

I apologize in advance if these criticisms get BSG shutdown by the government censors

The president's aides will not publish updated economic forecasts, citing volatility in U.S. economy.

thephan wrote:If you had any doubts that Zuckerburg is only interested in money, now you should have none. It is pretty wild to have the leader of a company built on sharing information say that the company has no responsibility for truth.

thephan wrote:If you had any doubts that Zuckerburg is only interested in money, now you should have none. It is pretty wild to have the leader of a company built on sharing information say that the company has no responsibility for truth.

JUburton wrote:he's a legitimate sociopath who half lucked/stole his way into a multi-billion dollar empire.

traderdave wrote:Draft language is out regarding the impending EO against Twitter, FB, etc. Here is a sample:

"In a country that has long cherished the freedom of expression, we cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand-pick the speech that Americans may access and convey online," the draft order says. "This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. When large, powerful social media companies censor opinions with which they disagree, they exercise a dangerous power."

Of course, none of that is actually happening. Even the two tweets that started all of this are still out there on Twitter. Where is the censorship?