CalvinBall wrote:Wisconsin Supreme Court votes along party lines 4-2 to override the Governor's order to postpone in person voting. This party truly does not care about your life or safety. No idea how anyon, in good faith, can support them.

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

CalvinBall wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

Certainly need to get better at typing on my phone and proofreading.

"Doctors disagree about things all the time. My qualifications in terms of looking at the science is that I'm a social scientist," he told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I have a Ph.D. And I understand how to read statistical studies, whether it's in medicine, the law, economics or whatever."

thephan wrote:

"Doctors disagree about things all the time. My qualifications in terms of looking at the science is that I'm a social scientist," he told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I have a Ph.D. And I understand how to read statistical studies, whether it's in medicine, the law, economics or whatever."

All right. Nuff Said

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

Certainly need to get better at typing on my phone and proofreading.

You're attacking two posters whom have consistently denounced Trump and have also backed up their personal POV, which clearly don't reflect current policies. What more do you want? Judging by this year's primaries, not everyone is a Bernie Bro.

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

Certainly need to get better at typing on my phone and proofreading.

You're attacking two posters whom have consistently denounced Trump and have also backed up their personal POV, which clearly don't reflect current policies. What more do you want? Judging by this year's primaries, not everyone is a Bernie Bro.

Monkeyboy wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

Certainly need to get better at typing on my phone and proofreading.

You're attacking two posters whom have consistently denounced Trump and have also backed up their personal POV, which clearly don't reflect current policies. What more do you want? Judging by this year's primaries, not everyone is a Bernie Bro.

But I don't think he mentioned Trump. I'm not sure about werthless, but I don't think I have never seen JH disavow GOP tactics to suppress voting. I agree they both have said they don't like Trump many times.

jerseyhoya wrote:It's nonsense to include Werthless with me. I'm a Republican jackass, whatever. Not sure if Werthless has voted once or twice for a Republican for President, but he's at 50% at most and going lower in November. He's not a partisan, and has been posting a lot of liberal/Dem curious things in here beyond the short term Trump specific stuff. Seems counterproductive to target him?

Not sure what cballs thing with Werthless is. But it's dumb.

Werthless wrote:I think Sanders is likable and authentic. I think he'll do well with low information voters, especially as he has more opportunities to explain his social support plans against Trump's plans to cut these programs.

momadance wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

momadance wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:And the US supreme court add insult to injury by overturning a lower court decision to allow mail in ballots postmarked too late will not count. Some voters don't even have their ballots yet.

Jh and Werthless actively support this party, don't let them fool you.

Are you high?

Certainly need to get better at typing on my phone and proofreading.

You're attacking two posters whom have consistently denounced Trump and have also backed up their personal POV, which clearly don't reflect current policies. What more do you want? Judging by this year's primaries, not everyone is a Bernie Bro.

But I don't think he mentioned Trump. I'm not sure about werthless, but I don't think I have never seen JH disavow GOP tactics to suppress voting. I agree they both have said they don't like Trump many times.

This is fucking stupid. Whom else would he be talking about? Have you ever seen JH or Werthless ever support voter supression? Provide quotes.

At Monday's briefing, Fox News correspondent Kristin Fisher asked the President about a recently released report from the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General which details challenges facing hospitals in responding to the coronavirus pandemic, including shortages of supplies and equipment, as well as prolonged wait times to get testing results.

In response, Trump said, "It's just wrong. Did I hear the word 'inspector general,' really? It's wrong."

When pushed on the fact that the report was released by his own administration, Trump suggested the findings were politically motivated, asking, "Well where did he come from, the inspector general? What's his name?" Trump later added, "So give me the name of the inspector general. Could politics be entered into that?"