JFLNYC wrote:The problem with all this stuff is Team Trump always manages to retain the slightest shred of plausible deniability which their supporters totally buy into.

azrider wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:The problem with all this stuff is Team Trump always manages to retain the slightest shred of plausible deniability which their supporters totally buy into.

Team Trump and his supporters

JFLNYC wrote:The problem with all this stuff is Team Trump always manages to retain the slightest shred of plausible deniability which their supporters totally buy into.

JUburton wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Grotewold wrote:Hasn't he said repeatedly he'd soak the ultra rich?

He's a more honest than that, acknowledging he'd probably raise taxes on the middle class. Not nearly enough to pay for what he's proposing, but at least unlike Warren he's not lying about it entirely. His spending can't be remotely paid for by soaking the ultra rich or just the regular old rich.

We could maybe, reduce the 750 billion dollar defense budget idk.

jerseyhoya wrote:

JUburton wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Grotewold wrote:Hasn't he said repeatedly he'd soak the ultra rich?

He's a more honest than that, acknowledging he'd probably raise taxes on the middle class. Not nearly enough to pay for what he's proposing, but at least unlike Warren he's not lying about it entirely. His spending can't be remotely paid for by soaking the ultra rich or just the regular old rich.

We could maybe, reduce the 750 billion dollar defense budget idk.

We could, maybe, reduce the military budget, but he's proposing $50 trillion in new spending over the next 10 years. Would more than double the federal budget and be ~7x the military budget over that time period, increase the share of GDP taken up by the federal government by 20%.

Luckily for him, the American people are bad at math. Unluckily for him, they're scared by attack ads that wave big numbers around.

Warszawa wrote:If Parnas is to be taken at his word the breadth of this conspiracy is stunning

Warszawa wrote:If Parnas is to be taken at his word the breadth of this conspiracy is stunning

Grotewold wrote:What would happen if he shot a Democratic congresswoman at the State of the Union

Quagland wrote:Too bad Myspace isn't still a thing. My aunt would have loved posting that on her page.

Utah’s Department of Health planned to distribute 100,000 condoms turning some popular state slogans and landmarks into double-entendres. But it apparently did not amuse Governor Gary Herbert, who put a stop to the campaign just hours after it became public.

“The Governor understands the importance of the Utah Department of Health conducting a campaign to educate Utahns about HIV prevention,” his spokeswoman, Anna Lehnardt, told FOX 13 in a statement. “He does not, however, approve the use of sexual innuendo as part of a taxpayer-funded campaign, and our office has asked the department to rework the campaign’s branding.”

Quagland wrote:Too bad Myspace isn't still a thing. My aunt would have loved posting that on her page.