ye @kanyewest
My eyes are now wide open and now realize I’ve been used to spread messages I don’t believe in. I am distancing myself from politics and completely focusing on being creative !!!

Doll Is Mine wrote:

ye @kanyewest
My eyes are now wide open and now realize I’ve been used to spread messages I don’t believe in. I am distancing myself from politics and completely focusing on being creative !!!

Oh good lord

ye
‏


@kanyewest

I introduced Candace to the person who made the logo and they didn’t want their name on it so she used mine. I never wanted any association with Blexit. I have nothing to do with it.

CalvinBall wrote:Lol

It's so wild people are undecided. Been texting with my pal in Nashville trying to get him to vote for Bredesen. He's basically as moderate as they come but thinks the wall is bad and thinks gays shouldn't be denied employment. Seems like an easy choice but here we are.

pacino wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:Lol

It's so wild people are undecided. Been texting with my pal in Nashville trying to get him to vote for Bredesen. He's basically as moderate as they come but thinks the wall is bad and thinks gays shouldn't be denied employment. Seems like an easy choice but here we are.

Should we go RACE WAR or mild centrism? Decisions, decisions

pacino wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:

pacino wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:

pacino wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:way too many polling places use hackable machines with no paper trail to recount. Reps will win those places. InGeorgia, those machines tend to be in dem areas. Probably the same way in other states. Connect the dots.

most of PA uses old machines with no paper trail but it hasn't been much of a real issue. The issue is access to the ballot, not the ballot itself. stop fear mongering this when there is something VERY REAL we can work on that is actually happening.

I'm not fear mongering. I'm genuinely concerned about it, and I'm not suggesting we don''t do the other things to help. I'm capable of multi-tasking.

I think they have a HUGE incentive to cheat in whatever way they think they can get away with. People are literally going to go to jail in this administration if and when the dems win the House. They have shown zero pause in stepping over every line if it helps them to win and stay in power. There is also evidence that these machines are very easy to hack and we know that there are sophisticated groups from Russia that have already hacked into our voting apparatus. I have to ask why you are not afraid of it happening? The alarm should be raised so we can be proactive on election day rather than reactive if something happens.

In any case, having paper trails for election results is one of the first things dems should do if and when they regain power. Making sure this is in people's minds is not fear mongering, imho.

I'm actually on the ground with our local groups learning and researching it. I've spoken with our election services, met w the county commissioner most involved, have gotten updates on the machines currently in use, the machines to be bid on, and the process for rolling them out come next election. You are acting as if nothing is being done. People are doing all sorts of stuff; they just aren't giving it to Seth Abramson or whoever to bloviate on Twitter about it.

This is confusing, Pac. First, I don't have a tracker on you (yet), so I had no idea you were doing these things. Second, you've just shown that me making a post on a message board hasn't stopped you from addressing the problem or do anything else that you might find useful. Third, you've just shown that it is an important thing (otherwise, you were wasting your time) and I would think that informing people about the problem would be one step in addressing the problem that you obviously think is important enough to spend time doing something about. And fourth, you are not the only person in the world and not everyone may be as informed as you, so maybe me saying something about it isn't a terrible thing.

Your post amounts to saying, "Hey, I know I've spent hours and hours learning about and addressing this problem, but don't waste 15 seconds of anyone's time talking about that problem on a message board." Weird.

Your stuff amounts to fearmongering. You keep saying that 'they' may switch the votes or whatever but this isn't anywhere as easy as you imply. The speculation drowns out legitimate concerns about ballot access.

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:14th Amendment

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

I mean even the SCOTUS wouldn't think he could do this...


yeah, I'm delusional

pacino wrote:Jess King debate on WGAL NBC 8

She's doing very well

Phred wrote:

LastTrain wrote:

Phred wrote:

LastTrain wrote:

Phred wrote:Messianic Jews, by definition, aren't Jews.

What's the official definition of a Jew?

One of the basic tenets of Judaism is the belief that the messiah has not yet arrived.

Messianic Jews believe that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah and that the New Testament is the authoritative scripture. Salvation in Messianic Judaism is achieved only through acceptance of Jesus as one's savior and Jewish laws or customs which are followed do not contribute to salvation.

Are you talking about Judaism or the historic accepted definition(s) of who is a Jew? These are not the same. I think you're choosing an incredibly narrow and not at all widely accepted definition.

Granted, I agree with the idiocy of the choice in the context of the earlier discussion.

What the fuck are you talking about?

I would love to hear what you think would be the "historic accepted definition(s) of who is a Jew" that isn't "one who follows the tenets of Judaism" (or something similar).

heyeaglefn wrote:Do signs in yards accomplish much? Other than letting people know who you support can't imagine signs influence people.

The evidence lies in obscure docket entries at the clerk’s office for the D.C. Circuit. Thanks to Politico’s Josh Gerstein and Darren Samuelsohn, we know that on August 16th (the day after Giuliani said he was almost finished with his memorandum, remember), a sealed grand jury case was initiated in the D.C. federal district court before Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. We know that on September 19, Chief Judge Howell issued a ruling and 5 days later one of the parties appealed to the D.C. Circuit. And thanks to Politico’s reporting, we know that the special counsel’s office is involved (because the reporter overheard a conversation in the clerk’s office). We can further deduce that the special counsel prevailed in the district court below, and that the presumptive grand jury witness has frantically appealed that order and sought special treatment from the judges of the D.C. Circuit – often referred to as the “second-most important court in the land.”