threecount wrote:Unbelievable...Huckabee's daughter pretty much just came out on THIS WEEK now on ABC that Trump just basically reacted to Mark Levin, Breitbart and Fox which was the reason for the Saturday morning wire-tap tweet..he has no evidence and just wants an investigation...

Why do the American people stand for this?

Monkeyboy wrote:How long before his handlers just start placing things on Fox News knowing he'll go tweet about it. He's a puppet and is too dumb to know it.

Jon Favreau‏ @jonfavs

Barack Obama's master plan:
1) Wiretap the opposition
2) Gather damaging info
3) Say nothing
4) Let him win
5) Ride off into the sunset

pacino wrote:Nunes is going to investigate the President. PRESIDENT OBAMA

Breitbart cited the Trump tweet (created because he read Breitbart) as evidence.

pacino wrote:Nunes is going to investigate the President. PRESIDENT OBAMA

Breitbart cited the Trump tweet (created because he read Breitbart) as evidence.

"One of the focus points of the House Intelligence Committee's investigation is the U.S. government's response to actions taken by Russian intelligence agents during the presidential campaign," Nunes said in a statement Sunday. "As such, the Committee will make inquiries into whether the government was conducting surveillance activities on any political party's campaign officials or surrogates, and we will continue to investigate this issue if the evidence warrants it."

pacino wrote:his tweets were based off a speculative piece by a conservative pundit which itself was based off a month old Guardian piece that we previously posted here. it was discussing the FISA court rejection of a 'wiretap' in July, but a narrower one regarding banks was approved in october.

there's nothing to investigate because it's all batshit crazy conspiracy stuff from Trump. he read a printed out breitbart or gateway pundit piece and got a tweetin'; the WH went silent for half a day to figure out a way out of it and then the Communications team put that out that they will not comment further on 'reports'.

it's just all bullshit. i'm going on a mini rant now. if you're a liberal i'd advise that it is best to not follow people like Louise Mensch who are just making people look bad and passing around mindless speculation. don't fall for the liberal side of this bullshit storm and focus on the obvious stuff right in front of our face (the lying, the conflicts of interest, the devolving of government,congress doing nothing). the truth is more than enough; we don't need to 'go low' and fall into conspiracy. there's simply too much real shit out there.

Youseff wrote:

pacino wrote:his tweets were based off a speculative piece by a conservative pundit which itself was based off a month old Guardian piece that we previously posted here. it was discussing the FISA court rejection of a 'wiretap' in July, but a narrower one regarding banks was approved in october.

there's nothing to investigate because it's all batshit crazy conspiracy stuff from Trump. he read a printed out breitbart or gateway pundit piece and got a tweetin'; the WH went silent for half a day to figure out a way out of it and then the Communications team put that out that they will not comment further on 'reports'.

it's just all bullshit. i'm going on a mini rant now. if you're a liberal i'd advise that it is best to not follow people like Louise Mensch who are just making people look bad and passing around mindless speculation. don't fall for the liberal side of this bullshit storm and focus on the obvious stuff right in front of our face (the lying, the conflicts of interest, the devolving of government,congress doing nothing). the truth is more than enough; we don't need to 'go low' and fall into conspiracy. there's simply too much real shit out there.

she's a loon. she's horrible.