Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

what say you

best movie
29
58%
whatever
19
38%
hate it
2
4%
 
Total votes : 50

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Youseff » Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:48:36

so will Jorus Cabooth be making an appearance?
This is what a real tenderoni likes to do for you

Youseff
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 22976
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 03:47:53
Location: Ice Mountain

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Swiggers » Sun Feb 03, 2013 16:47:56

mozartpc27 wrote:
Barry Jive wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote:In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.


you could have left out the part about disney

it would be like if Sony Pictures bought the rights to Citizen Kane and just started producing one sequel every three years. What does that really have to do with Orson Welles' story or vision?


i cannot think of a worse film for you to have picked for this analogy really


Sure you can, think harder.


Oh, can I play? I pick Salo.
jerseyhoya wrote:I think the reason you get yelled at is you appear to hate listening to sports talk radio, but regularly listen to sports talk radio, and then frequently post about how bad listening to sports talk radio is after you were once again listening to it.

Swiggers
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 5961
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 15:03:02
Location: Barrington, NJ

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby VoxOrion » Sun Feb 03, 2013 17:36:55

mozartpc27 wrote: In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.


The difference between Lucasfilm and Disney is that Disney know how to make good movies. George Lucas is a shit factory and Star Wars practically defined the concept of franchise property - Return of the Jedi was a toy commercial. "Drug out?" Are you kidding me? I don't think Disney has taken anything this seriously since it built Disney World. This sentiment is complete nonsense.
“There are no cool kids. Just people who have good self-esteem and people who blame those people for their own bad self-esteem. “

VoxOrion
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12963
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 09:15:33
Location: HANLEY POTTER N TEH MAGICALASS LION

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby RichmondPhilsFan » Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:28:05

My god.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/06/han-solo-movie-boba-fett-movie-star-wars_n_2631584.html

Laugh it up, fuzzball: According to Anthony Breznican at EW.com, the first "Star Wars" spin-off films will center, respectively, on Han Solo and Boba Fett. Per Breznican, the Solo film will be an origin story set between "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" and "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope," the first "Star Wars" film to feature Solo as pilot of the Millennium Falcon.

Boba Fett, the bounty hunter introduced chronologically in "Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" (but first spied in "Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back"), would have his own film as well, which would take place between "Empire" and "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi."

Breznican's big story comes one day after Disney CEO Bob Iger confirmed the existence of "Star Wars" standalone films. "There has been speculation about some standalone films that have been in development, and I can confirm to you today that in fact we are working on a few stand-alone films," Iger told CNBC. That news wasn't exactly new: Iger initially discussed multiple "Star Wars" films back in October of 2012, when Disney purchased Lucasfilm.

On Wednesday, Ain't It Cool News founder Harry Knowles reported that there would also be a Yoda standalone movie; Breznican's report doesn't discount that possibility as well.

The news of a Han Solo origin story practically broke Twitter; a smattering of reaction can be seen below.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Barry Jive » Thu Feb 07, 2013 17:19:33

whoa
no offense but you are everything that's wrong with America

Barry Jive
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 37856
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 21:53:43
Location: I'm Doug, solamente Doug.

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Bill McNeal » Thu Feb 07, 2013 17:33:17

Heard they are going to cast Seth Green as Han Solo and The Rock as Boba Fett

Bill McNeal
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 27673
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 21:05:24
Location: A Place To Be Somebody

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Bill McNeal » Thu Feb 07, 2013 17:33:34

Not really

Bill McNeal
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 27673
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 21:05:24
Location: A Place To Be Somebody

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Barry Jive » Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:40:46

guess who's playing Han Solo for real though

this guy

Image
no offense but you are everything that's wrong with America

Barry Jive
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 37856
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 21:53:43
Location: I'm Doug, solamente Doug.

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby WheelsFellOff » Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:41:52

I'm assuming in a similar way that Nemoy played Spock in the reboot.
So far the Eagles have been unable willing to at least make a good will jester - Garry Cobb, Professional Sportswriter

jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high

WheelsFellOff
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27290
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 13:43:13
Location: Bologna

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Barry Jive » Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:56:51

probably in a smaller role, but in that case Nimoy had to play an alternate bit version of himself because Spock was already in the movie. I doubt Han Solo will be the main focus but there's more potential there.
no offense but you are everything that's wrong with America

Barry Jive
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 37856
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 21:53:43
Location: I'm Doug, solamente Doug.

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby WheelsFellOff » Fri Feb 15, 2013 13:00:05

Grampa, tell me 'bout the good ol' days...
So far the Eagles have been unable willing to at least make a good will jester - Garry Cobb, Professional Sportswriter

jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high

WheelsFellOff
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27290
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 13:43:13
Location: Bologna

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby dajafi » Fri Feb 15, 2013 16:01:41

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/battle-of-hoth/

Love this. Also check out the roundtable with military strategists who take issue with Ackerman.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Wolfgang622 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 19:12:46

VoxOrion wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote: In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.


The difference between Lucasfilm and Disney is that Disney know how to make good movies. George Lucas is a shit factory and Star Wars practically defined the concept of franchise property - Return of the Jedi was a toy commercial. "Drug out?" Are you kidding me? I don't think Disney has taken anything this seriously since it built Disney World. This sentiment is complete nonsense.


Laugh it up, fuzzball: According to Anthony Breznican at EW.com, the first "Star Wars" spin-off films will center, respectively, on Han Solo and Boba Fett. Per Breznican, the Solo film will be an origin story set between "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" and "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope," the first "Star Wars" film to feature Solo as pilot of the Millennium Falcon.

Boba Fett, the bounty hunter introduced chronologically in "Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" (but first spied in "Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back"), would have his own film as well, which would take place between "Empire" and "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi."

Breznican's big story comes one day after Disney CEO Bob Iger confirmed the existence of "Star Wars" standalone films. "There has been speculation about some standalone films that have been in development, and I can confirm to you today that in fact we are working on a few stand-alone films," Iger told CNBC. That news wasn't exactly new: Iger initially discussed multiple "Star Wars" films back in October of 2012, when Disney purchased Lucasfilm.

On Wednesday, Ain't It Cool News founder Harry Knowles reported that there would also be a Yoda standalone movie; Breznican's report doesn't discount that possibility as well.

The news of a Han Solo origin story practically broke Twitter; a smattering of reaction can be seen below.


I demand an apology.
"I'm in a bar with the games sound turned off and that Cespedes home run still sounded like inevitability."

-swish

Wolfgang622
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28653
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 23:11:51
Location: Baseball Heaven

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby The Dude » Sat Feb 16, 2013 01:08:27

read the effing thread and those are the spinoff movies, not the next in the series. they will still be good probably, and you can still stick to the original series
BSG HOF '25

The Dude
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 30280
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 23:04:37
Location: 250 52nd st

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Bucky » Sat Feb 16, 2013 08:34:36

NEWS FLASH: BOTH COMPANIES ARE ALL ABOUT SQUEEZING EVERY CENT POSSIBLE OUT OF STUPID SPACE CHARACTERS

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58017
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby pacino » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:05:10

mozart, youre being terrible in this thread
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby cartersDad26 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:22:16

Has there been any talk of Disney building a stand alone Star Wars theme park ar Disney World now? I have to think this is coming, and would be awesome. Universal currently has a little section but a whole park would rule. They have tons of land to do it.

Here's someone's take on it:
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/184dkn0 ... iginal.jpg

cartersDad26
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28730
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 19:15:07

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Barry Jive » Sun Feb 17, 2013 04:25:14

i am blown away that Moz is offended by new developments and being faithful to the prequels. the prequels are fucking crimes against humanity
no offense but you are everything that's wrong with America

Barry Jive
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 37856
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 21:53:43
Location: I'm Doug, solamente Doug.

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby PTOITWCFTPP » Sun Feb 17, 2013 08:51:09

I would go to that theme park

PTOITWCFTPP
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 66661
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 17:57:27

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney)

Postby Monkeyboy » Sun Feb 17, 2013 09:32:51

I would also go to that park.

They should have a ride where you get to murder jar jar binks. That would be worth the trip by itself
Agnostic dyslexic insomniacs lay awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

Monkeyboy
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28452
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 21:01:51
Location: Beijing

PreviousNext