mozartpc27 wrote:Barry Jive wrote:mozartpc27 wrote:In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.
you could have left out the part about disneyit would be like if Sony Pictures bought the rights to Citizen Kane and just started producing one sequel every three years. What does that really have to do with Orson Welles' story or vision?
i cannot think of a worse film for you to have picked for this analogy really
Sure you can, think harder.
jerseyhoya wrote:I think the reason you get yelled at is you appear to hate listening to sports talk radio, but regularly listen to sports talk radio, and then frequently post about how bad listening to sports talk radio is after you were once again listening to it.
mozartpc27 wrote: In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.
Laugh it up, fuzzball: According to Anthony Breznican at EW.com, the first "Star Wars" spin-off films will center, respectively, on Han Solo and Boba Fett. Per Breznican, the Solo film will be an origin story set between "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" and "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope," the first "Star Wars" film to feature Solo as pilot of the Millennium Falcon.
Boba Fett, the bounty hunter introduced chronologically in "Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" (but first spied in "Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back"), would have his own film as well, which would take place between "Empire" and "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi."
Breznican's big story comes one day after Disney CEO Bob Iger confirmed the existence of "Star Wars" standalone films. "There has been speculation about some standalone films that have been in development, and I can confirm to you today that in fact we are working on a few stand-alone films," Iger told CNBC. That news wasn't exactly new: Iger initially discussed multiple "Star Wars" films back in October of 2012, when Disney purchased Lucasfilm.
On Wednesday, Ain't It Cool News founder Harry Knowles reported that there would also be a Yoda standalone movie; Breznican's report doesn't discount that possibility as well.
The news of a Han Solo origin story practically broke Twitter; a smattering of reaction can be seen below.
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
VoxOrion wrote:mozartpc27 wrote: In being sold to Disney, it has gone from the closest thing to a novel written on film that I can think of to just another "franchise" property to be drug out every few years to make another guaranteed $400M or whatever.
The difference between Lucasfilm and Disney is that Disney know how to make good movies. George Lucas is a shit factory and Star Wars practically defined the concept of franchise property - Return of the Jedi was a toy commercial. "Drug out?" Are you kidding me? I don't think Disney has taken anything this seriously since it built Disney World. This sentiment is complete nonsense.
Laugh it up, fuzzball: According to Anthony Breznican at EW.com, the first "Star Wars" spin-off films will center, respectively, on Han Solo and Boba Fett. Per Breznican, the Solo film will be an origin story set between "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" and "Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope," the first "Star Wars" film to feature Solo as pilot of the Millennium Falcon.
Boba Fett, the bounty hunter introduced chronologically in "Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones" (but first spied in "Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back"), would have his own film as well, which would take place between "Empire" and "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi."
Breznican's big story comes one day after Disney CEO Bob Iger confirmed the existence of "Star Wars" standalone films. "There has been speculation about some standalone films that have been in development, and I can confirm to you today that in fact we are working on a few stand-alone films," Iger told CNBC. That news wasn't exactly new: Iger initially discussed multiple "Star Wars" films back in October of 2012, when Disney purchased Lucasfilm.
On Wednesday, Ain't It Cool News founder Harry Knowles reported that there would also be a Yoda standalone movie; Breznican's report doesn't discount that possibility as well.
The news of a Han Solo origin story practically broke Twitter; a smattering of reaction can be seen below.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.