Wolfgang622 wrote:Anyone else a little surprised that there is no team that sort of came from nowhere in this shortened season to be really in the hunt? 60 games is like nothing in baseball... remember the 1995 Phillies? The same Phillies who intentionally permitted Paul Quantrill, Tyler Green, Mike Mimbs, Sid Fernandez, Jeff Juden, and Mike Williams - yes, that Mike Williams - to start 102 of the team's 144 games in baseball's last shortened season?
They were 38-22 after 60 games, 24-13 after 37, where the Phillies are today.
The Marlins are a playoff team currently and the defending champ nats are one of the worst teams in the league. I guess that's not quite the same since 8 teams from each league make the playoffs. I do think it has to do with the landscape of the game, back in the '90s every team was trying to win, or at least put an entertaining team on the field for what they could afford. So bad or middling teams were usually full of veterans with maybe some name recognition and some past successes, so it wasn't crazy that they'd put on a good 60 game stretch or whatever and the magic would run out. Now the landscape is more that there are teams that are trying to win, they have a good mix of vet's, FA's and young talent, then you have teams that are rebuilding, they are essentially just punting the season. Look at the red sox, they wanted to get under the repeater tax so they sold off what they could and are starting a catcher we DFA'd. There aren't really teams in the middle anymore that could catch lightning in a bottle.