Barry Jive wrote:http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2010&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=2154,1274
Barry Jive wrote:http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2010&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=2154,1274
Currently viewing seasons between 2010 and 2012
my cousin mose wrote:you guys are really gonna piss offbumping this
Grotewold wrote:Barry Jive wrote:http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2010&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=2154,1274
Five times more valuable because of defense and baserunning?
He's not Fred Astaire out there
phdave wrote:Grotewold wrote:Barry Jive wrote:http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2010&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=2154,1274
Five times more valuable because of defense and baserunning?
He's not Fred Astaire out there
How does being a DH get factored into fielding WAR? Is it just set to 0?
phdave wrote:my cousin mose wrote:you guys are really gonna piss offbumping this
There's more than one?
Werthless wrote:phdave wrote:Grotewold wrote:Barry Jive wrote:http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2012&month=0&season1=2010&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=2154,1274
Five times more valuable because of defense and baserunning?
He's not Fred Astaire out there
How does being a DH get factored into fielding WAR? Is it just set to 0?
Yes, but the positional penalty for DH is severe and is a bigger penalty, generally, than poor fielding.
Trent Steele wrote:I'm not sure how the WAR calc works, but AROD has better wOBA, so the difference in WAR can't all be Defense and position. He's been better regardless of position.
Grotewold wrote:Trent Steele wrote:I'm not sure how the WAR calc works, but AROD has better wOBA, so the difference in WAR can't all be Defense and position. He's been better regardless of position.
Unless I'm reading them wrong, the wOBAs and wRCs are very very similar
Trent Steele wrote:Grotewold wrote:Trent Steele wrote:I'm not sure how the WAR calc works, but AROD has better wOBA, so the difference in WAR can't all be Defense and position. He's been better regardless of position.
Unless I'm reading them wrong, the wOBAs and wRCs are very very similar
Yes. They both constitute giant flaming trashcans of wasted millions.
Grotewold wrote:Trent Steele wrote:Grotewold wrote:Trent Steele wrote:I'm not sure how the WAR calc works, but AROD has better wOBA, so the difference in WAR can't all be Defense and position. He's been better regardless of position.
Unless I'm reading them wrong, the wOBAs and wRCs are very very similar
Yes. They both constitute giant flaming trashcans of wasted millions.
I hear ya; the 5 x 1 ratio just seemed way off to me, even accounting for 1B v 3B/DH
Barry Jive wrote:Howard putting up worse numbers at a much easier position
Barry Jive wrote:and running like he's got a piano on his back
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Grotewold wrote:Barry Jive wrote:Howard putting up worse numbers at a much easier position
By a few hundredths of percentage points
[/quote]Barry Jive wrote:and running like he's got a piano on his back
Compared to Ben Johnson run-alike A-Rod?