by Monkeyboy » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:20:22
pacino wrote:Democrats plan to fight over these nominations:
Tillers - SoS
Mnuchin - Treasury
DeVos- Education
Puzder - Labor
Price - HHS
Pruitt - EPA
Mulvaney - Office of Management and Budget
Sessions - Attorney General
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:24:28
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:24:59
Monkeyboy wrote:pacino wrote:Democrats plan to fight over these nominations:
Tillers - SoS
Mnuchin - Treasury
DeVos- Education
Puzder - Labor
Price - HHS
Pruitt - EPA
Mulvaney - Office of Management and Budget
Sessions - Attorney General
good luck without the filibuster
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by JUburton » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:27:45
Yeah I'm not sure even this GOP wants to go down that route with presidential appointees. I guess we'll see.pacino wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:pacino wrote:Democrats plan to fight over these nominations:
Tillers - SoS
Mnuchin - Treasury
DeVos- Education
Puzder - Labor
Price - HHS
Pruitt - EPA
Mulvaney - Office of Management and Budget
Sessions - Attorney General
good luck without the filibuster
GOP has 'hinted' they are keeping it on everything except SC nominations. game-changer, if true.
by thephan » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:29:02
by CFP » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:39:18
by JUburton » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:52:29
https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/816307667870195713CFP wrote:Don might have won this one. Some rumblings that the ethics watchdog thing may be swinging back the other way. Ryan to speak in 20 minutes...
by CalvinBall » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:02:02
by jerseyhoya » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:05:39
JUburton wrote:Yeah I'm not sure even this GOP wants to go down that route with presidential appointees. I guess we'll see.pacino wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:pacino wrote:Democrats plan to fight over these nominations:
Tillers - SoS
Mnuchin - Treasury
DeVos- Education
Puzder - Labor
Price - HHS
Pruitt - EPA
Mulvaney - Office of Management and Budget
Sessions - Attorney General
good luck without the filibuster
GOP has 'hinted' they are keeping it on everything except SC nominations. game-changer, if true.
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:07:11
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:08:32
CFP wrote:Don might have won this one. Some rumblings that the ethics watchdog thing may be swinging back the other way. Ryan to speak in 20 minutes...
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:11:05
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by JUburton » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:15:42
oh right, i conflated it with supreme court, sorry.jerseyhoya wrote:JUburton wrote:Yeah I'm not sure even this GOP wants to go down that route with presidential appointees. I guess we'll see.pacino wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:pacino wrote:Democrats plan to fight over these nominations:
Tillers - SoS
Mnuchin - Treasury
DeVos- Education
Puzder - Labor
Price - HHS
Pruitt - EPA
Mulvaney - Office of Management and Budget
Sessions - Attorney General
good luck without the filibuster
GOP has 'hinted' they are keeping it on everything except SC nominations. game-changer, if true.
Even this GOP doesn't need to go down this road, because Harry Reid, who is no longer a US Senator!, already did.
by 06hawkalum » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:16:31
pacino wrote:anyway, time to gut healthcare for 22 million people and leave the 'replace' part in limbo until after the 2018 midterms
delay and gut
by JUburton » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:18:10
repeal with it not fully taking place until 2019; easy!06hawkalum wrote:pacino wrote:anyway, time to gut healthcare for 22 million people and leave the 'replace' part in limbo until after the 2018 midterms
delay and gut
That would not appear to be a particularly pragmatic choice for the GOP if they wish to maintain control of the House in '18.
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:18:53
06hawkalum wrote:pacino wrote:anyway, time to gut healthcare for 22 million people and leave the 'replace' part in limbo until after the 2018 midterms
delay and gut
That would not appear to be a particularly pragmatic choice for the GOP if they wish to maintain control of the House in '18.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
by td11 » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:20:31
by CFP » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:21:07
by JUburton » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:27:08
td11 wrote:@brespolitico
BREAKING - House Rs reverse course on OCE
And djt will take credit of course
by pacino » Tue Jan 03, 2017 13:29:56
But this week the Obama administration said about 6.4 million Americans, or 400,000 more than at this point last year, have signed up for ACA coverage that begins Jan. 1, 2017. The 6.4 million comes from those Americans who signed up through the federal healthcare.gov web site and doesn’t account for residents of states like California, Colorado and New York that operate their own marketplaces. Millions more have signed up for, or renewed, coverage via those marketplaces, according to media reports.
But in key markets, like Florida, where some insurers such as UnitedHealth Group and Aetna are leaving the market, Obamacare enrollment is up by double-digit percentages. In Florida, enrollment is up 14% this year to nearly 1.3 million even with fewer choices compared to the same open enrollment window last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said.
Florida Blue appears to be a big benefactor of the enrollment surge in the state. "We are well ahead of our projections for this enrollment period," Florida Blue spokesman Paul Kluding said.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
