slugsrbad wrote:RIP taco trucks on every corner.
the greatest tragedy of them all.
slugsrbad wrote:RIP taco trucks on every corner.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:vox: going to be a disaster for the white working class
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/ ... king-class
thephan wrote:Now Florida on the other hand... no explanation there.
pacino wrote:it turns out the supposed mormon backlash wasn't real
JFLNYC wrote:MoBettle wrote:Don't forget her huge advantage in staff, offices and GROUND GAME. Dems did everything to serve this up for her on a silver platter. Just couldn't get enough people to like her.
This is the unfortunate truth. Trump won with less votes than Romney but Hillary got more than 6MM votes less than Obama. That's hard to get my brain around.
jerseyhoya wrote:pacino wrote:it turns out the supposed mormon backlash wasn't real
Mormons voting 61% GOP is pretty shocking. Bush got 80% in 2004.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:Omarosa Manigault, a former contestant on The Apprentice, and Donald Trump advocate, says those who vote against Trump will be placed on a special “list.”
“It’s so great our enemies are making themselves clear so that when we get into the White House, we know where we stand,” Omarosa told the Independent Journal Review at Trump’s election night party in New York City.
CalvinBall wrote:vox: going to be a disaster for the white working class
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/ ... king-class
The Dude wrote:With the way the presidency ages you, imagine what that fuck will look like in 2018. THe liver spots on his face will look like Pangaea
PSUsarge wrote:JFLNYC wrote:BigEd76 wrote:Looks like we're up to at least seven major cities, including Oakland and Seattle
Not sure what the endgame is here.
Too little, too late. More proof that too many people (especially those in urban areas) just assumed Trump becoming President could never happen.
You have to wonder how many of those people stayed home after seeing the polls for weeks predicting a big HRC win.
TenuredVulture wrote:I think we need to commit ourselves to really increasing our efforts to combat the worst effects of the next 4 years. I know Pac is politically active, and the rest of us need to come up with some ways we can do more.
I for one am considering at least donating money to environmental and civil liberties and civil rights groups. I would also like to engage in at least some activity on these issues, because those are the issues I care about that are most threatened. I would like to be in a position to support good Democratic candidates in the next 2 years. If the Trump administration is even close to the shitshow I think it might be, there are going to be lots of vulnerable Republicans in 2018. I sure hope the DNC is out right now recruiting solid candidates, and looking beyond the usual suspects when it does so. Yes, we've got to fight gerrymandering and voter suppression, and citizens Untied, but remember, gerrymandering can present opportunities in a wave election. The Tea Party also shows how highly motivated electorates can be mobilized despite establishment efforts against them. All those people protesting right now need to do more than shout "fuck Trump" and get active in involved.
When I think about how much I didn't do in the last election, I'm embarrassed for myself.
pacino wrote:self-described liberals were 26% of the electorate and went 84-10-6 for Clinton. Moderates were 39% and went 52-41-7 for Clinton. Conservatives were 35% and went 81-15-4 for Trump.
Protestants went 60-37-3 for Trump
Catholics went 52-45-3 for Trump
Morons went 61-25-14 for Trump
Jews went 71-24-5 for Clinton
Other went 58-33-9 for Clinton
None went 68-26-6 for Clinton
White Evangelical 81-16-3 fo Trump
First time voters went 56-40-4 for Clinton
LGTBQ went 78-14-8 for Clinton
High school or less 51-45-4 for Trump
Some college 52-43-5 for Trump
College 49-45-6 for Clinton
Postgraduate 58-37-5 for Clinton
Under 30k 53-41-6 for Clinton
30-50k 51-42-7 for Clinton
50-99k 50-46-4 for Trump
100-199k 48-47-5 for Trump
200-249k 49-48-3 for Trump
Over 250k 48-46-6 for Trump
Cities 59-35-6 for Clinton
Suburbs 50-45-5 for Trump
Rural 62-34-4 for Trump
TenuredVulture wrote:I think we need to commit ourselves to really increasing our efforts to combat the worst effects of the next 4 years. I know Pac is politically active, and the rest of us need to come up with some ways we can do more.
I for one am considering at least donating money to environmental and civil liberties and civil rights groups. I would also like to engage in at least some activity on these issues, because those are the issues I care about that are most threatened. I would like to be in a position to support good Democratic candidates in the next 2 years. If the Trump administration is even close to the #$!&@ I think it might be, there are going to be lots of vulnerable Republicans in 2018. I sure hope the DNC is out right now recruiting solid candidates, and looking beyond the usual suspects when it does so. Yes, we've got to fight gerrymandering and voter suppression, and citizens Untied, but remember, gerrymandering can present opportunities in a wave election. The Tea Party also shows how highly motivated electorates can be mobilized despite establishment efforts against them. All those people protesting right now need to do more than shout "#$!&@ Trump" and get active in involved.
When I think about how much I didn't do in the last election, I'm embarrassed for myself.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.